Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 18, 2018 at 15:03 history edited Gimli CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 61 characters in body
Jul 18, 2018 at 15:00 comment added Gimli @rumtscho Thank you for fitting it. While it is unlikely that animal feed meets higher standards than the one declared as ment for human consumption, there may be some different values for the maximum allowed amount of toxins. And if for example the concentration in animal feed is allowed to be twice as high that should be no issue for a healthy human. But if there are amounts allowed that are exceeding the human standards by more than one magnitude regular consumption may be harmful.
Jul 18, 2018 at 13:37 history edited rumtscho CC BY-SA 4.0
reworded so as not to be understood as subjective
Jul 18, 2018 at 13:34 comment added rumtscho There is no universal standard for "safe", food safety is defined by what the relevant agency declares safe. Of course there is an intuitive understanding of "safe" which means whether the speaker would choose to eat it, but that is a subjective discussion not suitable for the site. The best we could do instead of closing is to edit it to ask whether the criteria for animal feed are equal to or tighter than the criteria for human food, so I reworded. Also, removed the reference to "other food" because that made the question too broad, which is a close reason.
Jul 17, 2018 at 20:43 answer added Fabby timeline score: 3
Jul 17, 2018 at 17:41 review Close votes
Jul 25, 2018 at 3:05
Jul 17, 2018 at 15:10 history edited Gimli CC BY-SA 4.0
added 43 characters in body
S Jul 17, 2018 at 12:52 history edited Kate Gregory CC BY-SA 4.0
corrected some mispelled words
S Jul 17, 2018 at 12:52 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 4.0
corrected some mispelled words
Jul 17, 2018 at 8:51 review Suggested edits
S Jul 17, 2018 at 12:52
Jul 17, 2018 at 6:50 history asked Gimli CC BY-SA 4.0