Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The claims and "proofs" in this paper do not look rigorous, and the arguments seem lacking to me. Did you read this paper? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2014 at 5:52
  • $\begingroup$ I went over it, and I agree that the methodology isn't that convincing, this is why I called it a "claim" rather than a result. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 11, 2014 at 7:55
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ And it is written in Microsoft Word :/ $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 14, 2014 at 11:36