Timeline for answer to Is there any way for a consumer to confirm that a device is actually UL listed? by Spehro 'speff' Pefhany
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2022 at 15:11 | comment | added | Steve Wellens | It was for a component (transformer) used in other products. We better stop having this conversation or we'll get yelled at! (Weird: I use the at sign to put your name in the post and it disappears). | |
| Dec 25, 2022 at 6:05 | comment | added | Spehro 'speff' Pefhany | @SteveWellens was that a one-time thing at approval or an ongoing inspection? Just curious. | |
| Dec 25, 2022 at 6:02 | comment | added | Steve Wellens | Point taken. FYI: I got a device UL approved. The UL rep required the calibration history of the measuring instruments! | |
| Dec 24, 2022 at 14:29 | comment | added | Spehro 'speff' Pefhany | @SteveWellens Yes, the idea is that if it lacks those elements it's probably not listed. The presence of them is necessary but insufficient. | |
| Dec 24, 2022 at 14:25 | comment | added | Steve Wellens | I imagine those could be quite easily faked. | |
| Dec 24, 2022 at 7:36 | history | edited | Spehro 'speff' Pefhany | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 101 characters in body
|
| Dec 24, 2022 at 7:23 | history | answered | Spehro 'speff' Pefhany | CC BY-SA 4.0 |