Skip to main content
Home Improvement

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • Sorry TD, this is not exactly correct. This is only true IF the original installation was not done to code. If a multi-wire branch circuit neutral is spliced where both circuits are being feed-thru the neutral MUST be spliced and pigtailed. The device CANNOT be used to carry the neutral through. Once the circuit is split into two separate 2-wire circuits then the neutral can be fed through the receptacle. From then on there is no fear of shock since the neutral is only carrying the current of that one hot wire. This is why 2-pole or tied breakers were NOT code required until recently. Commented Aug 30, 2014 at 11:41
  • @SpeedyPetey - good point - that is a possibility we can't wisely discount. Can any of us count on that being true, though? I don't feel comfortable hanging anyone else's life on the unproven assumption that it is. Commented Aug 30, 2014 at 12:26
  • @SpeedyPetey It's possible that the wire nut for the neutrals wasn't installed correctly, to the point that the one that goes back to the breaker box falls out. At that point you have exactly the situation described above. Commented Aug 30, 2014 at 14:55
  • Yes @Brad, and they could have used #14 on a 50A breaker and put 67 recessed lights on a 15A circuit. Sure, ANYTHING is possible. The "what if" scenarios could go on forever. The question was SHOULD he change all the breakers, and I said not unless it make him more comfortable. According to the philosophies of some we should all go around and bring existing older homes up to each new code standard as they are invented. I'll reiterate, TD's scenario above is only true IF the original installation was done incorrectly and not to code. Commented Aug 30, 2014 at 15:02
  • @SpeedyPetey Except that this one is an easy fix most of the time. I accept that there is a tradeoff to be made. For example when I rewired my sister's kitchen I could have ran a new cable for the lights as well, especially since it has pre-romex hemp wrapped cable without a ground. Instead I left it the way it was. It also still goes to the original fuse-box, which all of the lights are still wired to. I have worked in places where there is no electrical inspection for anything but new construction, So I don't trust wiring until I have seen it myself. Commented Aug 30, 2014 at 15:40