Abstract
Leonard andHegmon (1987) compare a series of dental metrics of ‘Australopithecus afarensis Johanson, White, andCoppens, 1978’ with criteria for modern apes, to test the hypothesis that ‘A. afarensis’ represents a single species. They also compare the morphology of the lower third premolar. The dental breadth of ‘A. afarensis’ shows a wide range of variation, particularly in the lower third premolar morphology which displays greater variation than in modern apes—yet the study concludes that the single species hypothesis cannot be rejected.
The study is flawed by applying criteria for pongids inappropriate for a hominid. When ‘A. afarensis’ is compared with criteria for hominids, the range of variation in dental size, breadth, and third premolar morphology is greater than that in any hominid species. The single species hypothesis is, therefore, once again rejected. Moreover, the name ‘A. afarensis’ is preoccupied byPraeanthropus africanus (Weinert) and must be dropped.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Campbell, T. D., 1925.Dentition and Palate of the Australian Aboriginal. Hassell Press, Adelaide, Australia.
Coon, C. S., 1962.The Origin of the Races. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Coppens, Y., 1981. Le cerveau des hommes fossiles. C. R.Acad. Sci. Série D Paris, 292: 3–24.
————, 1983. Systématique phylogénie, environnement et culture des australopithéques, hypothés et synthése.Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropo. (Paris), 10(13): 73–84.
Dahlberg, A. A., 1960. The dentition of the first agriculturests (Jarmo, Iraq).Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 18: 243–256.
Day, M. H., M. D. Leakey, &T. R. Olson, 1980. On the status ofAustralopithecus afarensis.Science, 207: 1102–1105.
Ferguson, W. W., 1983. An alternative interpretation ofAustralopithecus afarensis fossil material.Primates, 24: 397–409.
————, 1984. Revision of fossil hominid jaws from the Plio/Pleistocene of Hadar, in Ethiopia including a new species of the genusHomo (Hominoidea: Hominiae).Primates, 25: 519–529.
————, 1986. The taxonomic status ofPraeanthropus africanus (Primates: Pongidae) from the late Pliocene of eastern Africa.Primates, 27: 485–492.
————, 1987. Taxonomic status of the hominine cranium KNM-ER 1813 (Primates: Homininae) from the Plio/Pleistocene of Koobi Fora.Primates, 28: 423–438.
Garn, S. M., A. B. Lewis, &R. S. Kerewsky, 1968. The magnitude and implications of the relationship between tooth size and body size.Arch. Oral Biol., 13: 129–131.
Gregory, W. K., 1951.Evolution Emerging. Macmillan, New York.
Johanson, D. C. &M. Edey, 1981.Lucy, the Beginnings of Humankind. Simon & Schuster, New York.
————,T. D. White, &Y. Coppens, 1982. Dental remains from the Hadar Formation, Ethiopia: 1974–1977 Collections.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 57: 545–603.
Leakey, R. E., 1981.The Making of Mankind. E. P. Dutton, New York.
Leonard, W. R. &M. Hegmon, 1987. Evolution of P3 morphology inAustralopithecus afarensis.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 73: 41–63.
Mayr, E., 1953.Methods and Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw Hill, New York.
————, 1969.Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw Hill, New York.
Olson, T. R., 1981. Basicranial morphology of the extant hominoids and Pliocene hominids: New material from the Hadar Formation, Ethiopia, and its significance in early human evolution and taxonomy. In:Aspects of Human Evolution, Symposia for the Society of Human Biology,C. B. Stringer (ed.), Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 99–128.
————, 1985. Cranial morphology and systematics of the Hadar Formation hominids and ‘Australopithecus africanus.’ In:Ancestors: The Hard Evidence,E. Delson (ed.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 102–119.
Perzigian, A. J., 1981. Allometric analysis of dental variation in a human population.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 54: 341–345.
Read, D. W., 1984. From multivariate statistics to natural selection: A reanalysis of the Plio/Pleistocene hominid dental material. In:Multivariate Statistical Methods in Physical Anthropology,G. N. von Vark &W. W. Howells (eds.), Reidel, New York, pp. 377–413.
Robinson, J. T., 1956. The Dentition of the Australopithecinae.Transvaal Museum Memoir No. 29, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria.
Ruby, L., 1950.Logic, An Introduction. Lippincott, Chicago.
Senut, B. &C. Tardieu, 1985. Functional aspects of Plio/Pleistocene limb bones: Implications for taxonomy and phylogeny. In:Ancestors: The Hard Evidence,E. Delson (ed.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 193–201.
Simons, E. L., 1967. The significance of primate paleontology for anthropological studies.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 27: 307–332.
Tardieu, C., 1983. L'articulation du genou des primates catarhinies et hominides fossiles. Implications phylogénétique et taxonomique.Bull. Mem. Soc. Anthropo. (Paris), 10(13): 355–372.
Tobias, P. V., 1980. ‘Australopithecus afarensis’ andA. africanus: critique and an alternative hypothesis.Palaeont. Afr., 23: 1–17.
———— &G. H. R. von Koenigswald, 1964. A comparison between the Olduvai hominines and those of Java and some implications for hominid phylogeny.Nature (London), 204: 515–518.
von Koenigswald, G. H. R., 1966.The Evolution of Man. Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Wolpoff, M. H., 1978. Analogies and interpretation in paleoanthropology. In:Early Hominids of Africa,C. Jolly (ed.), Duckworth, London, pp. 495–502.
Wood, B. A., 1979. An analysis of tooth and body size relationships in five primate taxa.Folia Primatol., 31: 187–211.
Zihlman, A. L., 1985a.Australopithecus afarensis: Two sexes or two species? In:Hominid Evolution: Past, Present and Future,P. V. Tobias (ed.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 213–220.
————, 1985b. Sex and the single species.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 66: 246. (Abstract)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ferguson, W.W. Critique of ‘Australopithecus afarensis’ as a single species based on dental metrics and morphology. Primates 30, 561–569 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380881
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380881


