Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of Digital Imaging
  3. Article

Evaluation of the Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support system based on 2 years of clinical experience

  • Published: May 1995
  • Volume 8, pages 75–87, (1995)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Evaluation of the Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support system based on 2 years of clinical experience
Download PDF
  • D. V. Smith MD1,2,3,4,
  • S. Smith1,2,3,4,
  • G. N. Bender1,2,3,4,
  • J. R. Carter1,2,3,4,
  • Y. Kim1,2,3,4,
  • M. A. Cawthon1,2,3,4,
  • R. G. Leckie1,2,3,4,
  • J. C. Weiser1,2,3,4,
  • J. Romlein1,2,3,4 &
  • …
  • F. Goeringer1,2,3,4 
  • 802 Accesses

  • 17 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support (MDIS) system at Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC) has been operational in a phased approach since March 1992. Since then, nearly all image acquisition has been digital with progressively increasing primary softcopy diagnosis used. More than 375,000 computed radiography (CR) images as well as other modality images have been archived. Considerable experience in installation and implementation phasing has been gained. The location and ergonomic aspects of equipment placement were refined with time. The original clinical scenario was insufficiently detailed and additions were made to facilitate smoother and more complete transition toward a filmless environment. The MDIS system effectiveness and performance have been good in terms of operational workload throughput, background operations, and reliability. The important areas regarding reliability are image acquisition, output, display, database operations, storage, and the local area network. Fail-safe strategies have been continually improved to maintain continuous clinical image availability during the times when the MDIS system or components malfunction. Many invaluable lessons have been learned for effective quality assurance in a hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system. These issues include training, operational quality control, practical aspects of CR image quality, and increased timeliness in the generation and distribution of radiographic reports. Clinical acceptability has been a continuous process as each phase has been implemented. Clinical physicians quickly used the workstations soon after the start of MDIS at MAMC. The major advantage for clinicians has been the amount of time saved when retrieving multimodality images for review. On the other hand, the radiologists have been slower in their acceptance of the workstation for routine use. Radiologists need the completed software and hardware implementation to achieve the throughput necessary for a high-volume practice setting in making primary softcopy diagnoses.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

The Imaging Department of the Modern Hospital

Chapter © 2019

A Survey of Medical Imaging, Storage and Transfer Techniques

Chapter © 2019

Recent trend in medical imaging modalities and their applications in disease diagnosis: a review

Article 16 October 2023

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Hardware Performance and Reliability
  • Medical Imaging
  • Multimedia Information Systems
  • Radiology
  • Radiography
  • System Robustness

References

  1. Goeringer F: Medical diagnostic imaging support systems for military medicine. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1444: 340–350, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support System, Specification. Huntsville, AL, US Army Engineering Division, Solicitation No. DACA87-90-R-0058, June 22, 1990

  3. Leckie RG, Walgren HN, Vincent S, et al: Clinical experience with teleradiology in the U.S. military. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 2165:301–311, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lyche DK, deTreville RE, Norton G, et al: MDIS early experience and efficacy of wide-area intercontinental teleradiology. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 2165:271–282, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  5. Patterson DA, Gibson G, Katz RH: A Case for Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Disks (RAID). Report No. UCB/CSD 87/391, Berkeley, CA, University of California, December 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glicksman RA, Wilson DL, Perry J, et al: Architecture of a high-performance PACS based on a shared file server. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1654:158–168, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stewart BK. Local area network topologies, media, and routing in: RSNA Syllabus: A Special Course in Computers for Clinical Practice and Education in Radiology. Oak Brook, IL, RSNA, 1992, pp 79–96

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith DV, Smith S, Sauls F, et al: Design strategy and implementation of the medical diagnostic image support system at two large military medical centers. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1654:148–157, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saarinen AO, Goodsitt M, Loop JW: The logistics of installing PACS in an existing medical center. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1093:159–170, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leckie RG, Goeringer F, Smith DV, et al: Early evaluation of MDIS workstations at Madigan Army Medical Center. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1897:336–349, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson DL: Compression in radiologic systems. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1654:130–139, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ishigaki T, Sakuma S, Ikeda M, et al: Clinical evaluation of irreversible image compression: Analysis of chest imaging with computed radiography. Radiology 175: 739–743, 1990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MacMabon H, et al: Data compression: Effect of diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology 178:175–179, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sayre J, Ho B, Boechat M, et al: Subperiosteal resorption: Effect of full-frame image compression of hand radiographs on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 185:599–603, 1992

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins CA, Lane D, Frank M, et al: Design of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study of 10:1 lossy image compression. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 2166:149–158, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meredith G, Anderson K, Wirsz E, et al: Modeling and simulation of a high performance PACS based on a shared file system architecture. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1654:169–179, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson DL, Smith DV, Rice B: Intelligent prefetch strategies for historical images in a large PACS. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 2165:112–123, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bidgood WD Jr, Horii SC: PACS mini refresher course: Introduction to the ACR-NEMA DICOM standard, in RSNA Syllabus: A Special Course in Computers for Clinical Practice and Education in Radiology, pp 37–46, 1992

  19. Horii SC, Bidgood WD Jr: Network and ACR-NEMA protocols, in: RSNA Syllabus: A Special Course in Computers for Clinical Practice and Education in Radiology. Oak Brook, IL, RSNA, 1992, pp 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prior P: Specifying DICOM compliance for modality interfaces. Radiographics 13:1381–1388, 1993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang HK: Three methods of implementing a picture archiving and communication system, in: RSNA Syllabus: A Special Course in Computers for Clinical Practice and Education in Radiology, pp 47–54, 1992

  22. Cawthon MA, Weiser JC, Smith DV: Application of IMACS: The military model. AAPM Summer School Proc 22:545–568, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  23. Taira RK, Chan KK, Stewart BK: PACS reliability issues, picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) in medicine. NATO ASI Series F 74:149–156, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  24. Personal communication, S.C. Horii, University of Pennsylvania, January 1994

  25. Romlein J, Leckie RG, Smith S, et al: Evaluation of specific PACS equipment components—Operational and maintenance experience. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 2164:198–208, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  26. Romlein J, Weiser JC, Sheehy MR, et al: Acceptancetesting design execution and results for large scale PACS installation. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 2165:569–581, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  27. Romlein J, Weiser JC, Sheehy MR, et al: Acceptancetesting design and execution for large-scale PACS Installation. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1899:441–451, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stewart BK, Massoth RJ, Thomas SR: Mini-PACS. AAPM Summer School Proc 22:123–156, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  29. Haynor DR, Smith DV, Park HW, et al: Hardware and software requirements for a picture archiving and communication system’s diagnostic workstations. J Digit Imaging 5:107–117, 1992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weiser JC, Leckie RG, Freedman MT, et al: Significance of the Fuji AC-1 algorithms on hardcopy images. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1897:199–203, 1993

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Willis CE, Weiser JC, Leckie RG, et al: Optimization and quality control of computed radiography. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 2164:178–185, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marglin S, Rowberg A, Godwin J: Preliminary experience with portable digital imaging for intensive care radiography. J Thor Imaging 5:49–54, 1990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Leckie RG, Meyer C, Parker J, et al: Evaluation of traumatic lateral cervical spine computed radiography images: Quality control acceptance of images for clinical diagnosis, hardcopy versus high resolution monitors. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 1897:128–133, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leckie RG, Goeringer F, Smith DV, et al: The MDIS workstation—An update of performance after nearly two years of clinical use. SPIE Proc Med Imaging 2164:318–332, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  35. Arenson RL, Chakraborty DP, Seshadri SB: The digital imaging workstation. Radiology 176:303–315, 1990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Madigan Army Medical Center, 98431-5000, Tacoma, WA

    D. V. Smith MD, S. Smith, G. N. Bender, J. R. Carter, Y. Kim, M. A. Cawthon, R. G. Leckie, J. C. Weiser, J. Romlein & F. Goeringer

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle

    D. V. Smith MD, S. Smith, G. N. Bender, J. R. Carter, Y. Kim, M. A. Cawthon, R. G. Leckie, J. C. Weiser, J. Romlein & F. Goeringer

  3. Department of Radiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft Sam Houston, TX

    D. V. Smith MD, S. Smith, G. N. Bender, J. R. Carter, Y. Kim, M. A. Cawthon, R. G. Leckie, J. C. Weiser, J. Romlein & F. Goeringer

  4. Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support Project, US Army Medical Material Agency, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD

    D. V. Smith MD, S. Smith, G. N. Bender, J. R. Carter, Y. Kim, M. A. Cawthon, R. G. Leckie, J. C. Weiser, J. Romlein & F. Goeringer

Authors
  1. D. V. Smith MD
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Smith
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. N. Bender
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. R. Carter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Y. Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. A. Cawthon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. G. Leckie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. C. Weiser
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Romlein
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. F. Goeringer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The opinions or assertions contained in this article are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Army Medical Department, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense.

This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, D.V., Smith, S., Bender, G.N. et al. Evaluation of the Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support system based on 2 years of clinical experience. J Digit Imaging 8, 75–87 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168130

Download citation

  • Issue date: May 1995

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03168130

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Key words

  • filmless hospital
  • Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support (MDIS) System
  • picture archiving and communication system (PACS)

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

3.19.75.189

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature