Czech J. Food Sci., 2009, 27(10):S120-S124 | DOI: 10.17221/935-CJFS

Study of Resistant Starch (RS) Content in Peas during Maturation

R. Dost�lov�*,1, J. Hor��ek1, I. Hasalov�2, R. Trojan2
1 Agritec, Research, Breeding and Services, Ltd., 787 01 �umperk, Czech Republic
2 SEMO, Ltd., 798 17 Smr�ice, Czech Republic, *E-mail: dostalova@agritec.cz

Total starch (TS), amylose and resistant starch (RS) were determined in the sets of smooth pea and wrinkled pea varieties in the years 2006-2008. Starch content of smooth peas varied in the range 53.61-57.23%. Average amylose content was 27.8%. Resistant starch content varied from 2.07% to 6.31%. Content of starch at wrinkled pea varied from 26.57% to 32.55%. Average amylose content was 76.82% of total starch. Content of total starch increases continually during seed development. The dependence of total starch on determined dry mass in harvested sample can be defined by equation γ = 1.2427 � -6.5611, by determination coefficient R2 = 0.8936 and highly significant correlation coefficient r = 0.945. Total starch content in dry seed reached final average value 29.56%. In garden pea, the level of maturity (by tenderometric measurement) and dry matter were determined. Resistant starch content of 11 garden pea cultivars was studied in three different terms of technological harvest.

Keywords: peas; total and resistant starch; amylose; dry matter; optimal term of harvest

Published: June 30, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dost�lov� R, Hor��ek J, Hasalov� I, Trojan R. Study of Resistant Starch (RS) Content in Peas during Maturation. Czech J. Food Sci.. 2009;27(Special Issue 1):S120-124. doi:�10.17221/935-CJFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ekvall J., Stegmark R., Nyman M. (2006): Content of low molecular weight carbohydrates in vining peas (Pisum sativum) related to harvest time, size and brine grade. Food Chemistry, 94: 513519. Go to original source...
    2. H�bl M., Urban J., V�clav�kov� J., Griga M. (2001): Evaluation of pea genetic resources collection for seed starch, amylose/amylopectin and protein content. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 37: 114123.
    3. Mikul�kov� D., �i�ov� I., Antal�kov� G., Kraic J. (2005): Content of resistant starch in grains of six undervalued plant species. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 41: 96104. Go to original source...
    4. Mikul�kov� D., Mas�r �., Kraic J. (2008): Biodiversity of legume health-promoting starch. Starch/Starke, 60: 426432. Go to original source...
    5. Sajilata M.G., Singhal Rekha S., Kulkarni Pushpa R. (2006): Resistant starch  A review. Comprehensive Rewiews in Food Science and Food Safety, 5: 117. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Vasanthan T.R.S., Bhatty R.S. (1998): Enhancement of resistant starch (RS3) in amylomaize, barley, field pea and lentil starches. Starch, 50: 275309. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content