Timeline for Help Verifying Simpleish PCB
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 hours ago | history | became hot network question | |||
| yesterday | answer | added | brhans | timeline score: 7 | |
| yesterday | history | edited | brhans | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
holy wall-o-text batman!
|
| yesterday | comment | added | Hearth | On second thought--are you interpreting the suggested layout as just saying where the components should be and not the routes traces take between them, or the size of said traces? Use a lot of filled zones for doing switching converter layouts. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | hcheung | 1) There are quite a few traces are not connected on the PCB, run "Design Rules Checker" on Kicad. 2) Don't create 90 degree trace bending. 3) There are insufficient decoupling capacitors as per suggestions from AN2586 - Getting started with STM32F10xxx hardware development, in general always read the datasheet or application notes on hardware design and follow the recommendations or reference design (for the applicable part to your circuit). | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Hearth | @CoolGuy5603 The TPS629210 has a pretty detailed layout section in the datasheet that explains everything you have to do. Why did you seemingly not follow any of its recommendations? Worst case, you can just copy the reference design from the evaluation board, which is also linked from the datasheet. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | CoolGuy5603 | Man I'm dumb, guy on reddit just told me that too. They also said the layout on the Buck Convertor was bad but I just went off the datasheet? I guess I'll take a look at everything a bit closer | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Michael | all of your caps are backwards. you have positive connected to gnd. | |
| S yesterday | review | First questions | |||
| 22 hours ago | |||||
| S yesterday | history | asked | CoolGuy5603 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |