Jump to content

User talk:Qwerfjkl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Special Barnstar
Short Description Barnstar
Special Barnstar
Articles for Creation Barnstar
Team Barnstar
Short Description Barnstar
Reviewer Barnstar
Team Barnstar
Hacker's Barnstar
Category Barnstar
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This user has redirect autopatrolled pseudo-rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Qwerfjkl (bot))
Discussions

Centralized discussions

[edit]

Village pump

[edit]
Village Pump (policy) (12 threads)
Village Pump (technical) (21 threads)
Village Pump (proposals) (13 threads)
Village Pump (idea lab) (22 threads)
Village Pump (WMF) (8 threads)
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (11 threads)


Administrative noticeboards

[edit]
Administrators' noticeboard (41 threads)
Administrators' noticeboard: Incidents (37 threads)
Administrative action review (4 threads)
Edit warring noticeboard (7 threads)
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (4 threads)
Bots noticeboard (3 threads)
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads)
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (9 threads)


Editors requesting help

[edit]
Wikipedians looking for help (0 requests)
0 page(s) currently transcluding the {{Help me}} template.


Requests for adminship

[edit]
Requests for adminship


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 14:16, 11 July 2025 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Recent RfA, RfBs, and admin elections (update)
Candidate Type Result Date of close Tally
S O N/A %
KylieTastic AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 374 66 101 85
Kj cheetham AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 350 64 127 85
Ser! AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 314 91 136 78
Curbon7 AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 293 87 161 77
Jlwoodwa AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 314 95 132 77
Smasongarrison AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 312 98 131 76
UndercoverClassicist AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 307 97 137 76
CoconutOctopus AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 315 110 116 74
Hinnk AE Successful 31 Jul 2025 260 100 181 72
Hilst AE Unsuccessful 31 Jul 2025 233 117 191 67
Pbritti AE Unsuccessful 31 Jul 2025 250 126 165 66
Patient Zero AE Unsuccessful 31 Jul 2025 250 130 161 66
Usernamekiran AE Unsuccessful 31 Jul 2025 232 127 182 65
Darth Stabro AE Unsuccessful 31 Jul 2025 167 205 169 45
North8000 AE Unsuccessful 31 Jul 2025 108 323 110 25
Vestrian24Bio AE Unsuccessful 31 Jul 2025 56 341 144 14




Question from Lbcconey2525 (21:53, 16 July 2025)

[edit]

I have been working on the page for the 21st Century Green-Book Project.

I am running into issues editing the page further. It is in good shape, but I have not finished proofing it. What would you recommend for getting pass teh technical issues I am having,

Is it in good enough shape for a review?

Thank you, Lillie --Lbcconey2525 (talk) 21:53, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lbcconey2525, it reads more like a promotional essay than a Wikipedia article - please see WP:NOTESSAY. Do you have a connection with the subject? — Qwerfjkltalk 13:09, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from YoungAce11 (23:21, 16 July 2025)

[edit]

How do i get started by writing a lyrics Ok Wikipedia --YoungAce11 (talk) 23:21, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YoungAce11, what do you mean by writing a lyrics Ok Wikipedia ? — Qwerfjkltalk 12:35, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Fords211372 (21:38, 17 July 2025)

[edit]

how do i create a page? because i was planning on making pages for the splinter groups (CVLT, H3LL, court etc) to the 764 organization page --Fords211372 (talk) 21:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fords211372, Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read Help:Your first article. If you haven't already also check out the tutorial; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! — Qwerfjkltalk 09:23, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 - Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase.

On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

[edit]
Endowment tax form, Wikimania, elections, U4C, fundraising and a duck!
And how do we know?
Five-year journey comes to healthy fruition.
Wikimedians from around the world will gather in person and online at the twentieth annual meeting of Wikimania.
As well as "hermeneutic excursions" and other scientific research findings.
The report covers the Foundation's operations from July 2023 - June 2024
A step towards objective and comprehensive coverage of a project nearly too big to follow.
Drawn this century!
How data from the Wikipedia "necessary articles" lists can shed new light on the gender gap
Annual plans, external trends, infrastructure, equity, safety, and effectiveness. What does it all mean?
Rest in peace.
Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
If you are too blasé for Mr. Blasé and don't give a FAC.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rcat doc

[edit]

Template:Rcat doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Apexskincare (16:09, 18 July 2025)

[edit]

I would like to make a Wikipedia page for myself and my small skin care business I do I do that --Apexskincare (talk) 16:09, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't. To understand why you shouldn't, read WP:SPAM, WP:AUTOBIO, WP:NOTABILITY & WP:NOT UrielAcosta (talk) 16:18, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Barnstar

[edit]

If my user page had been awarded with an award, then they would never have judged me for such things. 🤒 Spectra321578 (talk) 20:00, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has been spamming multiple user and project talk pages with requests to be awarded barnstars. I've warned them on their talk page about it, so right now it's probably best to ignore this request. - ZLEA T\C 16:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Fords211372 (00:49, 19 July 2025)

[edit]

how do i create my own page? --Fords211372 (talk) 00:50, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fords211372, Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read Help:Your first article. If you haven't already also check out the tutorial; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! — Qwerfjkltalk 12:39, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mass CfD stopped working

[edit]

The submit button on the Special:MassCFD page suddenly stopped working. Closing and reopening the browser didn't fix this. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 16:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LaundryPizza03, Is there anything in the browser console? Qwerfjkltalk 22:21, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how to check on Safari. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:50, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) WP:CONSOLEERROR :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:53, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wildmans island

[edit]

The article "Wildmans Island" is now created by me, see if it will be added to Wikipedia. Thanks! (Fifth77 (talk) 18:09, 19 July 2025 (UTC))[reply]

Fifth77, you can submit it for review by pressing the "Submit the draft for review!" button. — Qwerfjkltalk 13:04, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with renaming?

[edit]

Hi. I'm having some issues with mass renaming things. I've gotten the hang of the general process, but whenever I submit to CFD, the proposal isn't in the format of "propose renaming X to Y", but instead just "propose X" (example). In cases like those, I have to manually add the "to Y" part (example), which can be tedious. Is there something I'm doing wrong, or is it a problem on the script's end? Errors aside, thanks for making the script! It's very helpful! - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat22:58, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Sorry I didn't see this sooner.) OpalYosutebito, did you put the targets in "List of titles"? — Qwerfjkltalk 13:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so... I'll be sure to do that next time, and I'll let you know if it goes well or not - OpalYosutebitotalk』 『articles I want to eat14:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrap in IIFE?

[edit]

@Qwerfjkl. Hey there. I notice this user script introduces some variables into the global namespace such as config. This recently caused a bug in another user script (see here). I think this could be easily fixed if you wrapped your code in an IIFE. That is, just add (function() { to the top and }()); to the bottom. Would you be willing to give that a try? Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:22, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Novem Linguae,  Done. — Qwerfjkltalk 13:07, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started and continues until July 29 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 23–29 – Voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 – Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Tobeaboveall on 2023 Nigerian presidential election (06:55, 24 July 2025)

[edit]

I don't need --Tobeaboveall (talk) 06:55, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

== Question from SBG2025 (14:32, 25 July 2025) == WRONG BIO

Hi! I want to correct a biography that someone wrote bout me. A lot of informations are wrong and also damage my image. How can I fix it? Thanks! --SBG2025 (talk) 14:32, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from SBG2025 (15:01, 25 July 2025)

[edit]

Hi!

I hope this message finds you well.

I am reaching out to kindly request corrections and updates to a biography that has been published about me. This is not the first time I have attempted to address these concerns, and I appreciate your attention to the matter.

There are several inaccuracies and omissions in the current biography:

My correct date of birth is October 10, not October 30. I was born in Varese, not in Malnate. (There is no hospital in Malnate.) I respectfully ask that my year of birth be removed. In my profession as an actress, disclosing one's exact age can unintentionally limit casting opportunities and does not accurately reflect one’s range or abilities. I would also like to request the removal of any information regarding the documentation used for my working visa, as this is personal and sensitive, particularly while I am in the process of applying for a Green Card. The works listed as my most significant are outdated and do not reflect my recent or most impactful projects, especially those completed since relocating from Italy. It is also incorrect to state that I worked with Jon Fosse. While I performed in a production of Sonno, a play written by Fosse, the direction was by Valerio Binasco. The production received the Premio della Critica in 2010. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, I invite you to consult the full biography available on my official website: https://silviabottini.com/bio/

Thank you very much for your time and understanding.

I sincerely appreciate your efforts in ensuring the accuracy and professionalism of the information being shared.

Warm regards,

Silvia Bottini --SBG2025 (talk) 15:01, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SBG2025, our main policy on this matter is Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Regarding using your website as a source, the policy on this is Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Using the subject as a self-published source. In general, it wouldn't be considered reliable, but it can be used for some information.
  • My correct date of birth is October 10, not October 30 - the source in the article is https://web.archive.org/web/20241205002505/https://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/silvia-bottini/g9imEUUthbSl4hopXVH5T1/main/ which does indeed say you were born on the 30th October. In this case, you would not count as a reasonable source for this matter (because unfortunately people can lie about their age). However, per Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of personal information and using primary sources, If a subject complains about our inclusion of their date of birth, or the person is borderline notable, err on the side of caution and simply list the year, provided that there is a reliable source for it. Accordingly I will remove the month and day.
  • I was born in Varese, not in Malnate. Malnate is in Varese. In any case I have removed it from the article.
  • I respectfully ask that my year of birth be removed. To my knowledge, the most I can do is remove the day and month - but I'm not entirely sure on this, so you may wish to ask at the Teahouse for further help on this.
  • I would also like to request the removal of any information regarding the documentation used for my working visa, as this is personal and sensitive, particularly while I am in the process of applying for a Green Card. It is public information, see https://story.californiasunday.com/escape-your-meme/. However, as it's not particularly relevant to the article, I have removed it.
  • The works listed as my most significant are outdated and do not reflect my recent or most impactful projects, especially those completed since relocating from Italy. - please submit an edit request with what you would like to change it to (and make sure to mention you are the subject of the article in the request).
  • It is also incorrect to state that I worked with Jon Fosse. While I performed in a production of Sonno, a play written by Fosse, the direction was by Valerio Binasco. - it does not say you worked with Jon Fosse. It says you were cast in Fosse's Sonno (I have now corrected it), i.e. Sonno written by Fosse.
  • The production received the Premio della Critica in 2010. If you can provide a source for this that is independent of you, I will happily add this to the article.
— Qwerfjkltalk 16:02, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki scientific page has inaccurate information

[edit]

I am a self-published author and I teach my book on evolution in various senior colleges at the under graduate level. I have run across a particular Wiki page on Paul MacLean's triune brain theory that is very biased and it relies on journal articles that I have found to also be suspect.

My main concern is that both the wiki and the articles cited use "straw man" arguments that basically attribute to MacLean concepts that he does not state in his work, and then they attack these arguments. I went in and made some modifications that were then basically just over-ridden. I would like to see the wiki authors actually cite MacLean's work for their arguments, and not use their own opinions or the opinions of journal authors (who also mislead readers) with inaccurate comments on MacLeans - The Triune Brain in Evolution. Is there an impartial arbitrator that can be used to sort this out? Thanks. 71.169.191.235 (talk) 11:26, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

71.169.191.235, can I safely assume that you are the editor User:Mainelyevolution? You have never edited the article on this IP account.
In general, Wikipedia articles rely on secondary sources, whereas The Triune Brain in Evolution would be a primary source. If you can find some reliable secondary sources, it would probably be best to first discuss their addition on the talk page. — Qwerfjkltalk 16:05, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am mainelyevolution. How does one discuss additions? With what audience? 71.169.191.235 (talk) 13:14, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
71.169.191.235, you can start a topic on the talk page of the article. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:18, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Tbenny (20:56, 29 July 2025)

[edit]

I got a COI tag and AfD nomination for the MobileX page I created. I made some edits and posted responses. Is there anything else you would suggest me to do? --Tbenny (talk) 20:56, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tbenny, you appear to have quite an obvious COI (highlighting it as one of the best eSIM-based carriers for value-conscious users seeking flexible plans without contracts or overage fees) - you have denied having a COI. It does not help your case for the article if you are dishonest. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:22, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback! I want to clarify again that I have no affiliation with the company and no conflict of interest. I completely understand how the way the PCMag quote was framed could read as overly promotional, and I’ve made further revisions to align more closely with the tone and sourcing style used for similar entries. Would appreciate any additional feedback you may have to share to ensure this article meets Wikipedia's standards. Tbenny (talk) 00:17, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tbenny, the only really decent reference is the Bloomberg article, and maybe the PCMag one, though that's just a review. That will not meet WP:NCORP. — Qwerfjkltalk 12:09, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for massXFD

[edit]

Can you add TfD to your massXFD script? Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 18:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1isall, I'll have a go at it. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:23, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 20:07, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from DWRowlands (09:14, 31 July 2025)

[edit]

Hi! I'm not entirely sure if this counts as a question, but I'm an American urban geographer who recently moved to the Netherlands, and I'm interested in working on adding/expanding articles about Dutch cities and public transportation, at least partly by translating articles from Dutch. So any advice on resources/connections that would be useful for that would be appreciated. I gather I should start by working on copy-editing existing articles first, though? --DWRowlands (talk) 09:14, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DWRowlands, I would recommend first editing articles in your field of interest to get a feel for how they're structured and how Wikipedia articles are generally written, as you say. You can try this search for public transport (or Category:Public transport in the Netherlands) and Category:Cities in the Netherlands for some articles.
If you want to try translation, you can also expand existing articles with content from the Dutch Wikipedia - see Help:Translation for details on translation. You could try articles from this search e.g. add information from nl:Station Duiven to Duiven railway station. Let me know if you have any other questions/need any more help. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:39, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 27

[edit]

Qwerfjkl (bot): Notifying users of reference errors failure

[edit]

Qwerfjkl (bot)'s task "Notifying users of reference errors" failed to run per the configuration specified at Wikipedia:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 19:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Wcheeky (01:46, 2 August 2025)

[edit]

can I generate a living will for my estate? --Wcheeky (talk) 01:46, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wcheeky, is this question relevant to Wikipedia? — Qwerfjkltalk 18:43, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Unmuted Leader (18:50, 2 August 2025)

[edit]
Unmuted Leader's mentor Frostly is away.

I'm trying to get a term definition on wikipedia, how do I do that? --Unmuted Leader (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unmuted Leader, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. What is the term? — Qwerfjkltalk 21:09, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
UnMuted Leader 2600:8801:8D00:131:0:0:0:1008 (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:Bare URLs chart

[edit]

Template:Bare URLs chart has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-32

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 03:37, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from LogoFan2007 (14:44, 5 August 2025)

[edit]

Hello! --LogoFan2007 (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]