Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • These terms only describe the quality of effort, without clarifying permanency of the result. Crude language is rarely going to offer sufficient nuance when it is by definition sloppy and imprecise. Commented Apr 1, 2017 at 23:24
  • Yep, and that's why I said that in the answer itself. However I disagree that the vulgarity itself being sloppy and imprecise somehow makes it unsuitable for conveying sloppiness and imprecision. Commented Apr 4, 2017 at 15:21
  • It can certainly can, but such uses convey information about the vulgarity's source, not its subject/object. A "f*cking canoe" only offers clarification of "canoe" if I literally mean "canoe designed or designated for copulating." Commented Apr 4, 2017 at 19:27
  • What you describe is essentially the reason I used "rarely" rather than "never." Commented Apr 4, 2017 at 19:40
  • However "that f-ing canoe" can mean "the canoe which is the current target of my ire." Commented Apr 4, 2017 at 20:30