Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 4, 2018 at 15:07 comment added Ash @pipe By definition hubris is overbearing pride or arrogance so while neither has quite the vehemence of hubris than can be made to be substitutes.
Jul 4, 2018 at 15:07 comment added tautophile FWIW, I would pronounce hubris as /hoo-briss/ or perhaps /hyu-briss/--but I don't think I've ever had occasion to pronounce it. The related word hybrid is pronounced "high-bridd"; it is much more common than hubris.
Jul 4, 2018 at 15:02 comment added pipe Neither pride nor arrogance is a good substitute for hubris though (says I, a non-native speaker, but I am unusually brave today).
Jul 4, 2018 at 14:29 comment added FumbleFingers @Márton: Well, OP says that "original" spelling (hybris) can be used in Italian anyway. But you might be interested to note that the full OED first records that version in English in 1920, some decades after hubris. It never cauight on though.
Jul 4, 2018 at 14:23 comment added molnarm @FumbleFingers the comparison with the original spelling is interesting too, especially the sudden decline after 1959
Jul 4, 2018 at 13:59 comment added Ash @FumbleFingers Again that's a comparison of written language, this falls outside the parameters of this particular question.
Jul 4, 2018 at 13:13 comment added FumbleFingers @Ash: If you compare the AmE / BrE corpuses on my NGram link you'll see that the steady increase in traction (and current level of usage) are about equal for both. Apart from a slight uptick in BrE around the mid-60s, perhaps occasioned by the fact that C. S. Lewis used it in Poems (1964). Sure - it's probably outside the productive vocabulary of the majority of native Anglophones - but that's just because most people aren't very articulate, and don't know many different words in total.
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:49 comment added Ash @FumbleFingers Yes that's in England, and in writing where it is far more common than the spoken word. England is also far from being the only country the language is spoken, you do realise this yes?
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:45 comment added FumbleFingers ...and if you think the Mail isn't "lowbrow" enough for my point, I see there are 258 hits for hubris in The Daily Mirror. I won't descend to the depths of The Sun, but I've no doubt even they would be quite happy to use it today. It's no longer that rarefied.
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:42 comment added FumbleFingers @Ash: Well, as I said, back when I was an English Language / Literature undergraduate, I only ever came across it in academia. I would point out that a site-specific search on The Daily Mail ~(hardly an "academic" source!) finds 881 instances...
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:29 comment added Ash @FumbleFingers I've heard hubris used as a spoken word half a dozen times in 30+ years and always when someone is reading it from a text from the first half of last century.
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:23 comment added FumbleFingers @Oliver: The word didn't really exist in English before the OED's first cite (which refers to it as "Academic slang", while providing an "inline definition"), and the next cite isn't until 1923. My "evidence" for the ongoing / rising currency of the term in spoken English is based on a lifetime of using and hearing it - almost exclusively as an "academic" usage when I was a student half a decade ago, but it's well out there in more general use today. Definitely not "archaic", whether you believe that NGram supports my position or not.
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:07 history edited Oliver Mason CC BY-SA 4.0
italics added
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:06 comment added Oliver Mason Google n-grams are based on published books, rather than informal spoken language, so they are not really reliable evidence in this case.
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:04 comment added FumbleFingers Per this NGram, the word hubris (first recorded use by OED, 1884) has been steadily gaining traction over the past century. It may have come from ancient Greek, but it's actually a relatively modern usage, not "an archaic term".
Jul 4, 2018 at 12:00 history answered Ash CC BY-SA 4.0