Timeline for In 1700s, why was 'books that never read' grammatical?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2019 at 23:52 | comment | added | Ray Butterworth | This is more or less the answer I was about to give, so +1. (Though it does require more than only a comma insertion.) | |
| Sep 30, 2019 at 23:32 | comment | added | gnasher729 | To make clear that "books that never read" is not a phrase that is part of the sentence. | |
| Sep 30, 2019 at 21:17 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Oct 1, 2019 at 5:13 | |||||
| Sep 30, 2019 at 10:48 | comment | added | KillingTime | Your version involves a little more than inserting a comma in the right place. | |
| Sep 30, 2019 at 10:33 | history | answered | gnasher729 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |