Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • 8
    Not the same thing. "Alexander McQueen" is a metonym for Alexander McQueen-branded clothing. On the other hand, the original declaration is not an instance of metonymy; it's nonsense (except in the literal case of a wearable umbrella as pictured above). Commented Jun 13, 2012 at 20:34
  • 8
    You can most certainly wear an umbrella, just as you would wear a sword. I've seen plenty of people do so. How absurd to think you can't wear an umbrella. Commented Jun 13, 2012 at 23:34
  • 2
    @jcolebrand asked how it sounds to the ears of a Brit. Well, it doesn't make sense. You wear something attached to the body (a sword on a belt, a gun in a holster, a sandwich-board over the shoulders...); you carry something which will get lost if you let go of it. Perhaps American usage is different -- although another comment suggests that saying "wear an umbrella" sounds odd. The point I was making is that some languages do use the same word for both wear and carry -- French, for example, has porter. English has two distinct words for two distinct actions. Commented Jun 14, 2012 at 6:21
  • 3
    @AndrewLeach Yeah, that was rather my point. It sounds foreign, but not too foreign, like "this shouldn't make sense to me, but it must make sense to someone". Anyways, I think the phrase is poetic enough to be accurate. (Also: braying of a donkey :p) Commented Jun 14, 2012 at 14:49
  • 1
    "English has two distinct words for two distinct actions" -- or more precisely, English has two distinct words for a multitude of distinct actions, that we choose to collect into two groups for ease of reference but that other languages collect in one group, also for ease of reference ;-) Commented Dec 6, 2014 at 16:00