Paper 2026/147

OptiBridge: A Trustless, Cost-Efficient Bridge Between the Lightning Network and Ethereum

Abstract

Bridges, protocols that enforce a state transition on a destination ledger conditioned on an event on a source ledger, are central to modern DeFi. Conventional designs implicitly assume the source ledger event is publicly observable, an assumption that breaks with Layer-2 payment channels such as the Lightning Network, where state updates occur off-chain between counterparties and are invisible to others. This state of affairs advocates for new bridge designs for this setting. This paper introduces OptiBridge, a bridge between a payment channel (e.g., Lightning Network) and a smart-contract blockchain (e.g., Ethereum) that preserves safety and liveness without adding trust assumptions and remains fully compatible with existing Lightning and Ethereum stacks. OptiBridge follows an optimistic path in the common case: two honest channel peers materialize the intended state on the destination chain by revealing a pre-agreed secret. To handle faults and adversarial behavior, OptiBridge provides a dispute path orchestrated by a more expressive contract that is deployed {only on demand}. An implementation demonstrates substantial cost savings in the optimistic case: compared to Alba (NDSS’25), the optimistic contract deployment uses $\sim 73\%$ less gas ($1.22$M vs. $4.51$M), and proof submission costs $40{,}107$ vs. $253{,}566$ gas; when disputes arise, the dispute contract deployment costs $2{,}785{,}514$ gas and the core dispute call is cheaper ($196{,}438$ vs.$515{,}860$). Our analysis shows that rational users strictly prefer the optimistic path, whereas the dispute mechanism prevents coin theft and imposes higher fees and delays on the deviator.