Skip to content

Commit 31ee4ea

Browse files
committed
closes #104
1 parent c1a618f commit 31ee4ea

2 files changed

Lines changed: 19 additions & 3 deletions

File tree

‎finite.tex‎

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ \section{Descent and the context of a spectrum}\label{StableContextLecture}
145145
\right\},\]
146146
and note that an \(R\)--module \(M\) gives rise to a cosimplicial left--\(\mathcal D_{Hf}\)--module which we denote \(\mathcal D_{Hf}(HM)\). The totalization of this cosimplicial module gives rise to an \(HR\)--module receiving a natural map from \(M\), and we can ask for an analogue of \Cref{OriginalFFDescent}.
147147

148-
\begin{lemma}\label{DescentFromHFpToHZp}
148+
\begin{lemma}[{\cite[Proposition 2.14]{MNNDescent}}]\label{DescentFromHFpToHZp}
149149
For \(f\co \Z \to \F_p\) and \(M\) a connective complex of \(\Z\)--modules, the totalization \(\Tot \mathcal D_{Hf}(HM)\) recovers the \(p\)--completion of \(M\).\footnote{There is an important distinction between a \(p\)--complete module and a module over the \(p\)--completion. For example, \(\Q_p\) has a (continuous!) \(\Z_p\)--module structure, but it is not \(p\)--complete: the identity \(\Q_p \otimes_{\Z_p} \Z_p / p^j = 0\) inhibits its reconstruction from the associated descent data. This distinction is embedded in the formation of the derived category, but in turn this has its own wrinkles; see, for example, \cite[Appendix A]{HoveyStrickland} and \cite[Appendix A]{BarthelFrankland}.}
150150
\end{lemma}
151151
\begin{proof}[Proof sketch]
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ \section{Chromatic fracture and convergence}\label{ChromaticLocalizationSection}
12741274
\end{align*}
12751275
\end{lemma}
12761276
\begin{proof}[Analogy to \(j_* \vdash j^*\)]
1277-
The first formula stems from \(j\) an open inclusion, whose algebraic model is \(j^* M \simeq R \otimes M\).\footnote{Localizations which obey this formula are called ``smashing'', and they are quite interesting: the arithmetic localizations and \(L_d\) form a complete list of smashing localizations in \(\CatOf{Spectra}\)~\cite[7.5.6]{RavenelOrangeBook}, and smashing localizations (which are localizations at ring spectra) agree with their nilpotent completions~\cite{BousfieldLocalization}. (This can also be taken as an explanation of our interest in continuous Morava \(E\)--theory: by working internally to \(\CatOf{Spectra}_\Gamma\), we are forcing \(\widehat L_\Gamma\) to become smashing.) The smashing localization \(L_d\) is also particularly interesting: the Adams resolution of \(L_d \S\) is weakly equivalent to a finite resolution~\cite[8.2.4]{RavenelOrangeBook}, from which it follows that every \(E(d)\)--Adams resolution is weakly finite, and hence that there is a universal horizontal vanishing line in \(E(d)\)--Adams spectral sequences. In turn, if the ambient prime \(p\) is very large compared to the height of \(\Gamma\), the sparsity of the degrees \(|v_j|\) couples to this universal vanishing line to show that the \(E(d)\)--Adams spectral sequence always collapses, so that the theory of \(E(d)\)--local spectra is perfectly captured by the context \(\context{E(d)}\)~\cite[4.4.2, 6.2.10]{RavenelOrangeBook}. Higher categorical versions of this statement are now also known~\cite{BSS,Pstragowski}.} The second formula can be compared to the inclusion \(j\) of the formal infinitesimal neighborhood of a closed subscheme, whose algebraic model is \(j^* M = \lim_j (R/I^j \otimes M)\).\footnote{In keeping with our discussion of continuous Morava \(E\)--theory, it is also possible to consider the object \(\{\left( M_0(v^I) \sm L_d X \right)\}_I\) itself as a pro-spectrum. This is interesting to explore: Davis and Lawson have shown that setting \(X = \S\) gives an \(E_\infty\)--ring pro-spectrum~\cite{DavisLawson}, even though none of the individual objects are \(E_\infty\)--ring spectra themselves~\cite{MNN}.}
1277+
The first formula stems from \(j\) an open inclusion, whose algebraic model is \(j^* M \simeq R \otimes M\).\footnote{Localizations which obey this formula are called ``smashing'', and they are quite interesting: the arithmetic localizations and \(L_d\) form a complete list of smashing localizations in \(\CatOf{Spectra}\)~\cite[7.5.6]{RavenelOrangeBook}, and smashing localizations (which are localizations at ring spectra) agree with their nilpotent completions~\cite{BousfieldLocalization}. (This can also be taken as an explanation of our interest in continuous Morava \(E\)--theory: by working internally to \(\CatOf{Spectra}_\Gamma\), we are forcing \(\widehat L_\Gamma\) to become smashing.) The smashing localization \(L_d\) is also particularly interesting: the Adams resolution of \(L_d \S\) is weakly equivalent to a finite resolution~\cite[8.2.4]{RavenelOrangeBook}, from which it follows that every \(E(d)\)--Adams resolution is weakly finite, and hence that there is a universal horizontal vanishing line in \(E(d)\)--Adams spectral sequences. In turn, if the ambient prime \(p\) is very large compared to the height of \(\Gamma\), the sparsity of the degrees \(|v_j|\) couples to this universal vanishing line to show that the \(E(d)\)--Adams spectral sequence always collapses, so that the theory of \(E(d)\)--local spectra is perfectly captured by the context \(\context{E(d)}\)~\cite[4.4.2, 6.2.10]{RavenelOrangeBook}. Higher categorical versions of this statement are now also known~\cite{BSS,Pstragowski}.} The second formula can be compared to the inclusion \(j\) of the formal infinitesimal neighborhood of a closed subscheme, whose algebraic model is \(j^* M = \lim_j (R/I^j \otimes M)\).\footnote{In keeping with our discussion of continuous Morava \(E\)--theory, it is also possible to consider the object \(\{\left( M_0(v^I) \sm L_d X \right)\}_I\) itself as a pro-spectrum. This is interesting to explore: Davis and Lawson have shown that setting \(X = \S\) gives an \(E_\infty\)--ring pro-spectrum~\cite{DavisLawson}, even though none of the individual objects are \(E_\infty\)--ring spectra themselves~\cite{MNNNilpotence}.}
12781278
\end{proof}
12791279

12801280
\begin{lemma}\label{StableMixedKthyCoopnsVanish}

‎main.bib‎

Lines changed: 17 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2897,7 +2897,23 @@ @article{Mathew
28972897
author = "Akhil Mathew",
28982898
}
28992899

2900-
@article{MNN,
2900+
@article {MNNDescent,
2901+
AUTHOR = {Mathew, Akhil and Naumann, Niko and Noel, Justin},
2902+
TITLE = {Nilpotence and descent in equivariant stable homotopy theory},
2903+
JOURNAL = {Adv. Math.},
2904+
FJOURNAL = {Advances in Mathematics},
2905+
VOLUME = {305},
2906+
YEAR = {2017},
2907+
PAGES = {994--1084},
2908+
ISSN = {0001-8708},
2909+
MRCLASS = {55P91 (55P42)},
2910+
MRNUMBER = {3570153},
2911+
MRREVIEWER = {Gregory Z. Arone},
2912+
DOI = {10.1016/j.aim.2016.09.027},
2913+
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2016.09.027},
2914+
}
2915+
2916+
@article{MNNNilpotence,
29012917
author = {Mathew, Akhil and Naumann, Niko and Noel, Justin},
29022918
title = {On a nilpotence conjecture of J. P. May},
29032919
journal = {Journal of Topology},

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)