Copilot PR summary diffhunk links are frequently broken by bad formatting #185895
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Bug
Copilot Feature Area
Copilot in GitHub
Body
When using co-pilot to generate a PR summary it frequently generates badly formatted diffhunk links.
This results in them not rendering as links and so requires tedious manual intervention to fix them all.
It appears that the root cause is that it doesn't understand how backticks escape the link formatting.
e.g. It frequently produces:
resulting in:
instead of the corrected:
resulting in
(
[1],[2],[3],[4],[5])Note that I am not even sure the backticks are required at all so frequently just remove them completely instead of moving them around.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions