|
| 1 | +\documentclass{amsart} |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +% The following AMS packages are automatically loaded with amsart |
| 4 | +% documentclass: |
| 5 | +%\usepackage{amsmath} |
| 6 | +%\usepackage{amssymb} |
| 7 | +%\usepackage{amsthm} |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +% For commutative diagrams you can use |
| 10 | +% \usepackage{amscd} |
| 11 | +% but Jason prefers xypic |
| 12 | +\usepackage[all]{xy} |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +% To put source file link in headers. |
| 15 | +% Change "template.tex" to "this_filename.tex" |
| 16 | +\usepackage{fancyhdr} |
| 17 | +\pagestyle{fancy} |
| 18 | +\lhead{} |
| 19 | +\chead{} |
| 20 | +\rhead{Source file: \url{src/algebraic.tex}} |
| 21 | +\lfoot{} |
| 22 | +\cfoot{\thepage} |
| 23 | +\rfoot{} |
| 24 | +\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} |
| 25 | +\renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt} |
| 26 | +\renewcommand{\headheight}{12pt} |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +% For cross-file-references |
| 29 | +\usepackage{xr-hyper} |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +% Package for hypertext links: |
| 32 | +\usepackage[colorlinks=true]{hyperref} |
| 33 | +% For any local file, say "hello.tex" you want to refer to please use |
| 34 | +% \externaldocument[hello-]{hello} |
| 35 | +\externaldocument[conventions-]{conventions} |
| 36 | +\externaldocument[categories-]{categories} |
| 37 | +\externaldocument[hypercovering-]{hypercovering} |
| 38 | +\externaldocument[schemes-]{schemes} |
| 39 | +\externaldocument[desirables-]{desirables} |
| 40 | +\externaldocument[fdl-]{fdl} |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +% The macro \autoref uses the macros \figurename, etc. |
| 43 | +% We list the default values and we change some of them |
| 44 | +% to start with a captial. |
| 45 | +% Figure \figurename |
| 46 | +% Table \tablename |
| 47 | +% Part \partname |
| 48 | +% Appendix \appendixname |
| 49 | +% Equation \equationname |
| 50 | +% item \Itemname |
| 51 | +% \renewcommand{\Itemname}{Item} |
| 52 | +\renewcommand{\Itemautorefname}{Item} |
| 53 | +% chapter \Chaptername |
| 54 | +% \renewcommand{\Chaptername}{Chapter} |
| 55 | +% \renewcommand{\Chapterautorefname}{Chapter} |
| 56 | +% section \sectionname |
| 57 | +\renewcommand{\sectionname}{Section} |
| 58 | +\renewcommand{\sectionautorefname}{Section} |
| 59 | +% subsection \subsectionname |
| 60 | +\renewcommand{\subsectionname}{Subsection} |
| 61 | +\renewcommand{\subsectionautorefname}{Subsection} |
| 62 | +% subsubsection \subsubsectionname |
| 63 | +\renewcommand{\subsubsectionname}{Subsubsection} |
| 64 | +\renewcommand{\subsubsectionautorefname}{Subsubsection} |
| 65 | +% paragraph \paragraphname |
| 66 | +\renewcommand{\paragraphname}{Paragraph} |
| 67 | +\renewcommand{\paragraphautorefname}{Paragraph} |
| 68 | +% footnote \Hfootnotename |
| 69 | +% \renewcommand{\Hfootnotename}{Footnote} |
| 70 | +\renewcommand{\Hfootnoteautorefname}{Footnote} |
| 71 | +% Equation \AMSname |
| 72 | +% Theorem \theoremname |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +% Theorem environments. |
| 76 | +% |
| 77 | +\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[subsection] |
| 78 | +\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition} |
| 79 | +\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma} |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +\theoremstyle{definition} |
| 82 | +\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition} |
| 83 | +\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example} |
| 84 | +\newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise} |
| 85 | +\newtheorem{situation}[theorem]{Situation} |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +\theoremstyle{remark} |
| 88 | +\newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark} |
| 89 | +\newtheorem{remarks}[theorem]{Remarks} |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +\numberwithin{equation}{subsection} |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +% OK, start here. |
| 95 | +% |
| 96 | +\begin{document} |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +\title{Algebraic stacks} |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +%\begin{abstract} |
| 101 | +%\end{abstract} |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +\maketitle |
| 104 | +\thispagestyle{fancy} |
| 105 | + |
| 106 | +\tableofcontents |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +\section{Introduction} |
| 109 | +\label{section-introduction} |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +\noindent |
| 112 | +This is where we define algebraic stacks and make some very elementary |
| 113 | +observations. The general philosophy will be to have no separation |
| 114 | +conditions whatsoever and add those conditions necessary to make lemmas, |
| 115 | +propositions, theorems true/provable. Thus the notions discussed here |
| 116 | +differ slightly from those in other places in the literature, e.g., |
| 117 | +\cite{LM-B}. |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +\section{Definitions} |
| 120 | +\label{section-definitions} |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +\subsection{Algebraic spaces} |
| 123 | +\label{subsection-algebraic-spaces} |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +\noindent |
| 126 | +FIXME. |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +\begin{definition} |
| 129 | +An algebraic space is a stack $\mathcal{S}$ over $\text{Aff}$ such that |
| 130 | +\begin{enumerate} |
| 131 | +\item every fibre category is setlike, see Categories, |
| 132 | +\autoref{categories-subsection-fibred-in-sets}, |
| 133 | +\item the diagonal morphism |
| 134 | +$\Delta : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{S}\times\mathcal{S}$ |
| 135 | +is representable by schemes, see Schemes, |
| 136 | +\autoref{schemes-subsection-definition-representable-by-schemes} and |
| 137 | +\item there exists a stack $\mathcal{X}$ representable by a scheme, see |
| 138 | +Schemes, \autoref{schemes-subsection-stack-representable-by-scheme} |
| 139 | +and an \'etale surjective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{S}$, |
| 140 | +see Schemes, |
| 141 | +\autoref{schemes-definition-property-morphism-representable-by-schemes}. |
| 142 | +\end{enumerate} |
| 143 | +\end{definition} |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +\begin{remark} |
| 146 | +\label{remark-definition-correct} |
| 147 | +If you try to define some kind of more general algebraic space by requiring |
| 148 | +only that the diagonal is representable by algebraic spaces, and that there is |
| 149 | +a surjective etale morphism of an algebraic space onto $\mathcal{S}$, then |
| 150 | +you actually end up with the same notion. |
| 151 | +(FIXME: internal references, proofs.) |
| 152 | +\end{remark} |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +\subsection{Morphisms representable by algebraic spaces} |
| 155 | +\label{subsection-morphism-representable-by-algebraic-spaces} |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +\noindent |
| 158 | +Here is the formal definition. Please also see the informal discussion below. |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +\begin{definition} |
| 161 | +\label{definition-representable-by-algebraic-spaces} |
| 162 | +Let $f : \mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{Y}$ be a morphism of categories |
| 163 | +fibred in groupoids over $\text{Aff}$. We say $f$ is representable by |
| 164 | +algebraic spaces if for every stack $\mathcal{S}$ representable by a scheme |
| 165 | +(see Schemes, Definition \ref{schemes-definition-representable-by-scheme}), |
| 166 | +and every morphism $\mathcal{U} \to \mathcal{Y}$, the 2-fibre product |
| 167 | +$\mathcal{S}\times_\mathcal{Y}\mathcal{X}$ is an algebraic space. |
| 168 | +\end{definition} |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +\noindent |
| 171 | +Informal discussion. Suppose that, with the notation of the definition, |
| 172 | +$S$ represents $\mathcal{S}$. Suppose that $W$ is a scheme and that |
| 173 | +$\text{Aff}/W \to \mathcal{S}\times_\mathcal{Y}\mathcal{X}$ is |
| 174 | +etale and surjective. According to |
| 175 | +Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-morphism-stacks-representable-by-schemes} |
| 176 | +we get a morphism of schemes $g : W \to S$ and a 2-commutative diagram |
| 177 | +of stacks |
| 178 | +$$ |
| 179 | +\xymatrix{ |
| 180 | +\text{Aff}/W \ar[d]^g \ar[r] & |
| 181 | +\mathcal{S}\times_\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y} \ar[d] \ar[r] & |
| 182 | +\mathcal{Y} \ar[d] \\ |
| 183 | +\text{Aff}/S & |
| 184 | +\mathcal{S} \ar[l]^j \ar[r] & \mathcal{X} |
| 185 | +} |
| 186 | +$$ |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +\begin{definition} |
| 189 | +\label{definition-property-morphism-representable-by-algebraic-spaces} |
| 190 | +Let $P$ be a property of morphisms of schemes, that is etale local |
| 191 | +on the source and such that if the morphism $f : X \to Y$ has property $P$, |
| 192 | +then so does every base change of $f$. (FIXME: introduce base change.) |
| 193 | +We say that a morphism of stacks $\mathcal{X} |
| 194 | +\to \mathcal{Y}$ representable by algebraic spaces has property |
| 195 | +$P$ if for every diagram as above the morphism of schemes |
| 196 | +$g : W \to S$ has property $P$. |
| 197 | +\end{definition} |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +\noindent |
| 200 | +FIXME. Explain rationale behind this definition: what else could it be? |
| 201 | + |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +\subsubsection{Algebraic stacks} |
| 204 | +\label{subsubsection-algebraic-stacks} |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +\noindent |
| 207 | +FIXME. |
| 208 | + |
| 209 | +\begin{definition} |
| 210 | +An algebraic stack is a stack $\mathcal{S}$ over $\text{Aff}$ such that |
| 211 | +\begin{enumerate} |
| 212 | +\item the diagonal morphism |
| 213 | +$\Delta : \mathcal{S} \to \mathcal{S}\times\mathcal{S}$ |
| 214 | +is representable by algebraic spaces, see Definition, |
| 215 | +\autoref{definition-representable-by-algebraic-spaces} and |
| 216 | +\item there exists a stack $\mathcal{X}$ representable by a scheme, see |
| 217 | +Schemes, \autoref{schemes-subsection-stack-representable-by-scheme} |
| 218 | +and a smooth surjective morphism $\mathcal{X} \to \mathcal{S}$, |
| 219 | +see Definition |
| 220 | +\ref{definition-property-morphism-representable-by-algebraic-spaces}. |
| 221 | +\end{enumerate} |
| 222 | +\end{definition} |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | + |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +\smallskip\noindent |
| 227 | +To continue reading, |
| 228 | +\begin{enumerate} |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +\item visit the next section: Algebraic stacks desirables, |
| 231 | +\autoref{desirables-section-foundational}, or |
| 232 | + |
| 233 | +\item go back to the |
| 234 | +table of contents: \url{index.html#contents}. |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | +\end{enumerate} |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +\bibliography{my} |
| 239 | +\bibliographystyle{alpha} |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | +\end{document} |
0 commit comments