Timeline for Can Zechariah 9:9 be considered fulfilled as a messianic prophecy if the verse after it has not been fulfilled? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2025 at 14:12 | history | left closed in review |
Jason Adrian Mole Rob Callicotte |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| Dec 10, 2025 at 9:56 | comment | added | another theory | I was pointing out the clear inconsistency of some Q being closed when others are not, that also fall foul of the policy | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 17:12 | comment | added | user111403 | @anothertheory the site has a very clear policy of one question per post that this, in its previous iteration, quite obviously violated. I don't believe that you or Alex are incapable of understanding that policy. You are, of course, free to disagree with the closure, but the personal attacks and insinuations against people you disagree with are highly inappropriate. | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 11:59 | history | edited | Alex Balilo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 332 characters in body; edited title
|
| S Dec 9, 2025 at 11:54 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Dec 21, 2025 at 14:12 | |||||
| S Dec 9, 2025 at 11:54 | history | edited | Alex Balilo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 332 characters in body; edited title
Added to review
|
| Dec 9, 2025 at 11:28 | history | closed |
Jason Dieter Dottard user111403 Nigel J |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 11:03 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Dec 9, 2025 at 8:48 | comment | added | user111403 | The "two questions" on the one you linked are very closely tied together and are really different angles of the same question. This is indisputably two questions. But in any case, one bad question being left open isn't an excuse to ask another bad question. | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 4:41 | answer | added | Vincent Wong | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 4:30 | answer | added | AFrazier | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 4:05 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:44 | comment | added | Alex Balilo | @user67844. Your understanding that "A young male donkey is a colt. It was one colt that had never before been ridden" but the verse says, "7 They brought the donkey and the colt and put on them their cloaks, and he sat on them." | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:43 | comment | added | user67844 | Alex Balilo - I understand it as they put multiple cloaks on the animal ... so it was more than cloak on the colt which is what is meant by "them". But either way ... you've brought up a question worth asking. | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:43 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 9, 2025 at 11:37 | |||||
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:28 | comment | added | Alex Balilo | @Mary. This question also has 2 questions. They were not asked seperately. hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/111937/… | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:23 | comment | added | Alex Balilo | @user67844.Part of Matthew 21:7 says "7 They brought the donkey and the colt and put on them their cloaks, and he sat on them. | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:22 | comment | added | Mary | That's two questions. They need to be asked separately. | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:22 | comment | added | Alex Balilo | @Mary. Does anybody riding a donkey in Jerusalem become a messiah because of it? Matthew 21:4-7. How was Jesus able to ride a colt and a donkey at the same time? Were the animals of the same height and stride? | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:20 | comment | added | user67844 | A young male donkey is a colt. It was one colt that had never before been ridden. | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:20 | comment | added | Mary | Which is your question? | |
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:07 | history | edited | Alex Balilo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 9, 2025 at 3:01 | history | asked | Alex Balilo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |