Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    Up-voted +1. This is the basis of the word monogenes in the New Testament. It is more than merely a firstborn son. This is clear from Luke's use of the word in a variety of contexts. Much appreciated. Thank you. Commented 15 hours ago
  • @NigelJ - except that "monogenes" is never mentioned either in this answer nor in the LXX of Gen 22 - so why raise it? Commented 7 hours ago
  • It may be worth comparing to Galatians 3:16, which clarifies that Abraham's seeds (plural) are his descendents, but his seed (singular) is Jesus Christ. In Genesis, Isaac is a picture/type of Jesus, especially here: God told Abraham to sacrifice his only son, then had him stop and sent a lamb instead. Sent His only son. Abraham did not withhold his only son, just as God did not withhold His only Son. So, it looks like a clear parallel between Gen. 22:16, Gal. 3:16, and John 3:16. Commented 6 hours ago
  • @Dottard - maybe Nigel operates by a code that transcends that of SE Commented 2 hours ago