Timeline for answer to Does “Ur of the Chaldeans” imply Abraham was Babylonian or Mesopotamian? by Dottard
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| yesterday | comment | added | So Few Against So Many | @Jason, I claim he was a Babylonian by descent, you claim he was a Hebrew because he settled at Hebron. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Jason | @SoFewAgainstSoMany - I agree about Issac's miraculous birth, but you called Abram a Babylonian. Hence, the comment. | |
| yesterday | comment | added | So Few Against So Many | @Jason, Isaac was a miraculous birth because Sarah was beyond menopause unless menopause was still lots of years for their generation but the fathers of Abraham were Babylonians since Ur belonged to the Chaldeans(Kalideis). | |
| yesterday | comment | added | Jason | @SoFewAgainstSoMany - Then a fugitive came and told Abram the Hebrew. Now he was living by the oaks of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol and brother of Aner, and these were allies with Abram. - Gen 14:13 Hebrew meaning "one from beyond." | |
| 2 days ago | comment | added | So Few Against So Many | The call didn't change his DNA , he still had the DNA of his father in him, the DNA of the Chaldeans? Biologically speaking , we can argue from Isaac being a supernatural birth blessing but Abraham was clearly a Babylonian. | |
| 2 days ago | history | answered | Dottard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |