Timeline for answer to What are the arguments in favor of Matthean Priority? by Frank Luke
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2024 at 11:26 | comment | added | FelixLXX | Another book on this: link | |
| S Feb 24, 2021 at 22:03 | history | suggested | Hold To The Rod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
This is an excellent post - I touched it up by adding citations for the Patristic quotes, citing a source for "External" #4, and corrected some spelling
|
| Feb 24, 2021 at 1:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 24, 2021 at 22:03 | |||||
| Sep 6, 2016 at 20:44 | comment | added | user15733 | The reason so much emphasis is placed on the Church Fathers in the Orthodox Church is that we believe that what the Apostles actually taught was passed down to them faithfully (viz. 2 Th 2:15). Ignoring how they understood Scripture to me is somewhat akin to poring over the Declaration of Independence with a dictionary while Thomas Jefferson is in the room. | |
| Sep 6, 2016 at 20:02 | comment | added | Frank Luke | @TheNonTheologian, thank you. While I might disagree with the Church Fathers on some issues, to ignore them is to ignore early wisdom. It is the fallacy of modernity, that only the new can be true. | |
| Sep 1, 2016 at 1:57 | comment | added | user15733 | So encouraging to see someone appeal to the Church Fathers, rather than citing modern "experts" | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 23:43 | comment | added | Jas 3.1 | Could you add some examples under Textual Evidence #1? Thanks in advance. | |
| Mar 23, 2012 at 2:38 | comment | added | Frank Luke | @JonEricson, I can't do better than hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/1372/… | |
| Mar 21, 2012 at 14:13 | history | edited | Frank Luke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
| Mar 21, 2012 at 3:16 | history | edited | Frank Luke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2441 characters in body
|
| Mar 20, 2012 at 20:34 | comment | added | Bruce Alderman | This is a very thorough explanation. | |
| Mar 20, 2012 at 20:33 | vote | accept | Bruce Alderman | ||
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:48 | comment | added | Jon Ericson | On #4 of the textual evidence, could not Luke and Matthew be choosing to resolve the apparent contradiction between "when evening came" and "after the sun had set" in different ways? (I say contradiction because it sounds like Mark is saying two distinct times in English. Does the Greek read differently?) | |
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:40 | history | edited | Jon Ericson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Indenting the following paragraphs puts them under the item and preserves the numbering.
|
| Mar 20, 2012 at 19:13 | history | answered | Frank Luke | CC BY-SA 3.0 |