Timeline for answer to 1 Corinthians 13:10 - What does "The Perfect" Refer to? by elika kohen
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Nov 19, 2017 at 19:41 | comment | added | elika kohen | @Susan -A.) I removed the portions about nominative, neuter, etc. - and I agree. B.) Respectfully - depth of scholarship should be acknowledged when actual scholarship is present. Historically - this topic has been very toxic and "conclusory"; C.) In my opinion, a hermeneutic, academic, response should have a better form than my own - appealing to texts; D.) I suppose the only other possible argument could only be from a prophet or apostle, actually affirmed by God himself - which obviously excludes early Catholicism, (which appealed to tradition instead, like Rabbinicism). | |
| Nov 19, 2017 at 19:32 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Rearranged Content.
|
| Aug 20, 2016 at 22:15 | vote | accept | elika kohen | ||
| Aug 3, 2016 at 0:32 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Significantly Revised the Answer
|
| Aug 1, 2016 at 0:04 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 179 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 23:04 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 483 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 21:58 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed arguments regarding gender agreement; Added references to Greek grammatical rules.
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 19:53 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 35 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 19:14 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 35 characters in body
|
| Jul 29, 2016 at 8:57 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Incorporated Susan's Comments.
|
| Jun 25, 2015 at 2:36 | comment | added | Susan | Re. “referent” comment: no different conclusion (that’s why it was “incidental” ;-) ), just that the “nominative” part of “Pointing to some Noun, that is Nominative, Neuter, Single...” isn’t relevant. If it is pointing, the object (used loosely!) need not be nominative. | |
| Jun 25, 2015 at 1:47 | comment | added | Susan | I’m not David, but I’m sure you realize this referent has been the subject of much debate. The interpretation you offer is one among several, and many smart people have argued that others are more plausible. To say that it is “certain” and “conclusively proven” fails to acknowledge the depth of scholarship on the topic. (Also, incidentally, pronouns and other substantives with a “pronominal” sense are marked for case according to their function within the local syntax, not according to their referent.) | |
| Jun 25, 2015 at 0:12 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 57 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2015 at 20:57 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2015 at 20:22 | history | edited | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 464 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2015 at 19:48 | history | answered | elika kohen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |