Timeline for Dealing with questions showing "obvious" bias
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2018 at 15:06 | answer | added | T.E.D.Mod | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 21, 2018 at 12:15 | vote | accept | TheHonRose | ||
| Feb 21, 2018 at 6:53 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackHistory/status/966204240787058694 | ||
| Feb 20, 2018 at 19:48 | history | edited | T.E.D.Mod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Feb 20, 2018 at 15:08 | comment | added | TheHonRose | @LangLangC Yes, I did forget that one! And it is beginning to look like a trend, although early days, and sorry for your bruises! :) I suppose the only thing we can do is monitor it, and flag any that are too overtly biased. I could flood the site with questions as to how, when, where and why men have oppressed women historically, but I'd even bore myself ;) | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 14:58 | answer | added | T.E.D.Mod | timeline score: 14 | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 14:04 | comment | added | LаngLаngС | It is an idee fixed, you forgot one. And look at my bruises ;) – This kind of questions are now also increased on Politics and Skeptics. I wonder if it's revisionist campaigning directly or just swapping over from real life into SE. Currently the volume seems low, but the ice is thin. | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 9:41 | comment | added | Semaphore Mod | Other than attempting to persuade users to not grind axes with questions (often doesn't go well in my experience...) I think the best way to deal with this is for experienced users to rewrite the question to strip the biases and leave only the factual core of the questions. | |
| Feb 20, 2018 at 5:05 | history | edited | TheHonRose | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 20, 2018 at 4:43 | history | asked | TheHonRose | CC BY-SA 3.0 |