Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 17, 2022 at 12:25 answer added Tony Main timeline score: 0
Feb 22, 2020 at 23:07 vote accept Kerry L
Jan 2, 2020 at 4:27 comment added Tomas By "Fuel was usually J2 (derived from brown coal), with the option of diesel or a mixture of oil and high octane B4 aviation petrol." (wiki). Lots of Me262 pilots survived being shot down.
Dec 30, 2019 at 9:37 answer added Tomas By timeline score: 9
Sep 21, 2018 at 3:23 history edited Kerry L CC BY-SA 4.0
punctuation
Sep 21, 2018 at 3:18 history edited Kerry L CC BY-SA 4.0
punctuation
Sep 17, 2018 at 7:41 comment added bigbadmouse i have no idea, but the gentleman concerned who was there, said that they (ME262s) would literally explode when hit.
Sep 17, 2018 at 7:03 comment added janneb @bigbadmouse: Interesting. Modern jet fuel, at least, is significantly less flammable than gasoline (more like diesel from a safety perspective). Was WWII German jet fuel different?
Sep 14, 2018 at 0:45 history edited Kerry L CC BY-SA 4.0
formatting enhancements and a minor grammar correction
Sep 12, 2018 at 22:30 history edited Kerry L CC BY-SA 4.0
added 4 characters in body
Sep 11, 2018 at 8:39 comment added bigbadmouse I don't have a resource to cite, but I recall a video interview with a then-elderly Mustang pilot who described the speed of ME262 climb and said he shot one down by out turning it and "setting up a line of 50 cal" for it to fly into. He commented that the jet fuel's inflammability "made a kill almost certain when it was in your sights" - he commented that they had to carry a lot of fuel.
Sep 10, 2018 at 16:51 comment added Italian Philosopher @PieterGeerkens First, any reminder that statistical rigour should be followed deserves an upvote - you got mine. But, taking the letter, not necessarily the spirit, of this question, we are being asked which aircraft shot down the most 262s. Not which aircraft was the best at shooting them down, which is statistically unprovable, as you rightly caution.
Sep 10, 2018 at 16:17 answer added Italian Philosopher timeline score: 2
Sep 10, 2018 at 16:09 history edited Kerry L CC BY-SA 4.0
technical correction
Sep 10, 2018 at 16:04 comment added Kerry L @DavidThornley thanks for the correction, and even more, thanks for your father's service.
Sep 10, 2018 at 15:59 comment added David Thornley B-17s didn't have door gunners. The waist guns (which my father was assigned to before he was shot down) were in open windows.
Sep 10, 2018 at 11:02 comment added T.E.D. Some of the "losses" reported on the German side may well have been due to mechanical failure.
Sep 10, 2018 at 0:01 history tweeted twitter.com/StackHistory/status/1038940546461585408
Sep 9, 2018 at 23:55 comment added Kerry L @PieterGeerkens agreed, likely statisctically insignificant (it could depend on the number combinations of aircraft that actually engaged the 262, and of those numbers which percentage emerged the more victorious, but even so, these are small numbers so yeah, not much statistical significance could be attached). But there is historical curiosity at stake :-)
Sep 9, 2018 at 22:30 comment added PGeerkens According to Wikipedia, "Levine, Alan J. The Strategic Bombing of Germany, 1940–1945. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1992. ISBN 0-275-94319-4" states that only about 100 were shot down other in the air. If accurate, the sample size is likely much too small for statistical significance of the results by opposing plane type.
Sep 9, 2018 at 21:42 history edited Kerry L
added 2 characters in body - changed a tag
Sep 9, 2018 at 21:37 history edited Kerry L CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Sep 9, 2018 at 21:26 history asked Kerry L CC BY-SA 4.0