Skip to main content
History

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

9
  • 5
    Perhaps they are suggesting primary-sourcing the archaeologists who have written on the Clovis culture? Commented Mar 9, 2024 at 14:49
  • 2
    Is writing by archaeologists considered primary sources? Commented Mar 9, 2024 at 15:02
  • 7
    Perhaps they want you to analyze pottery, jewels or decorations in buildings. Art is considered a primary source, too. Commented Mar 9, 2024 at 15:32
  • 2
    @CarlosMartin - I suspected that was the case, but I needed your crib to find the answer below. Hat tip with gratitude. Commented Mar 9, 2024 at 17:04
  • 4
    The primary sources for the Clovis culture are presumably the projectile points (including location and frequency) and associated tools. Commented Mar 9, 2024 at 23:57