Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

8
  • You'll also have to depart from the story to assume that Jekyll/Hyde remains alive to face prosecution. Commented Dec 28, 2025 at 0:59
  • And moreover, to assume that he was able to resume the Jekyll persona after all. As his letter says, he believed he was stuck in the Hyde persona. If so then he would have been arrested and tried as Hyde, who would have no possible defence. Commented Dec 28, 2025 at 2:21
  • 1
    Is it your specific intention that this question relate to London circa 1886, rather than to other jurisdictions with their current legal systems? Commented Dec 28, 2025 at 12:28
  • 1
    @MarkMorganLloyd I have no specific jurisdiction in mind, though of course British laws of circa 1886 would be most applicable. Commented Dec 28, 2025 at 15:12
  • 1
    @Allure Peter is being a trifle pedantic, because 'murder' by definition is illegal, whereas 'kill(ing)' (for example) is legally agnostic. Commented Dec 29, 2025 at 15:30