Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 10, 2019 at 18:31 comment added gnasher729 Ask yourself: Would you rather pay a bit more, or be a victim of discrimination wherever you go?
Sep 16, 2015 at 17:38 comment added feetwet Presumably the legality of this is tied up in the legality of "affirmative action," which is the subject of tremendous amounts of jurisprudence. Unfortunately case law on that seems to be in flux.
Sep 16, 2015 at 16:35 comment added user662852 Seats in scheduled classes are more similar to seats in scheduled airplanes, than to supermarket or restaurant coupons. They hand out MBAs for this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yield_management
Sep 16, 2015 at 15:13 answer added lawful-n00b timeline score: 6
Sep 14, 2015 at 13:17 comment added Terry Clothes are a bad example as a man can wear womens clothes and vice-versa. The extra cost is usually because they are more intricate in design. In relation to haircuts, I have had to pay 'womens' prices for years, so it seems like it is style rather than gender that this is based on.
Sep 14, 2015 at 8:44 history edited jimsug
edited tags
Sep 14, 2015 at 5:27 comment added Dale M Not to mention the difference in price between men and women's haircuts!
Sep 14, 2015 at 2:15 review First posts
Sep 14, 2015 at 3:59
Sep 14, 2015 at 2:12 history asked Tom Santos CC BY-SA 3.0