Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • 1
    Can you cite any source on when a contract can be "void for uncertainty"? Commented Aug 2, 2021 at 23:56
  • @DavidSiegel hsfnotes.com/litigation/2017/04/06/… Commented Aug 3, 2021 at 0:20
  • 1
    @DavidSiegel That source is unavailing because it has nothing to do with the scenario the OP formulated. In Teekay Tankers the uncertainty at issue stems from an "agreement to agree" on pending matters. By contrast, in the OP's scenario there is no pending matter on which the parties need to agree afterwards: In the contract they are already agreeing on who (the company) will do what (charge €850) and the decision standard (at company's discretion). No need for customer's subsequent consent. That preempts the possibility of deadlock the court pointed out in Teekay Tankers. Commented Aug 3, 2021 at 10:35