Timeline for answer to Can you request a potential additional payment at own discretion? by Dale M
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2021 at 10:35 | comment | added | Iñaki Viggers | @DavidSiegel That source is unavailing because it has nothing to do with the scenario the OP formulated. In Teekay Tankers the uncertainty at issue stems from an "agreement to agree" on pending matters. By contrast, in the OP's scenario there is no pending matter on which the parties need to agree afterwards: In the contract they are already agreeing on who (the company) will do what (charge €850) and the decision standard (at company's discretion). No need for customer's subsequent consent. That preempts the possibility of deadlock the court pointed out in Teekay Tankers. | |
| Aug 3, 2021 at 0:24 | history | edited | David Siegel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
+tag
|
| Aug 3, 2021 at 0:20 | comment | added | Dale M♦ | @DavidSiegel hsfnotes.com/litigation/2017/04/06/… | |
| Aug 2, 2021 at 23:56 | comment | added | David Siegel | Can you cite any source on when a contract can be "void for uncertainty"? | |
| Aug 2, 2021 at 22:55 | history | answered | Dale M♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |