Skip to main content
Log in

Shortening antibiotic therapy duration for hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a causal inference model from the international EUROBACT-2 database

  • Original
  • Published:
Save article
View saved research
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 19 August 2025

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Hospital-acquired bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs) are severe and require antibiotic therapy. In non-complicated BSIs, shortened therapy reduces side effects without compromising efficacy. The impact of shortened antibiotic therapy in HA-BSI critically ill patients without indication of prolonged therapy requires further evaluation.

Methods

Using the international prospective EUROBACT-2 cohort, we compared shortened (7–10 days) versus long (14–21 days) treatment durations in ICU patients eligible for shortened therapy. Patients without antibiotic therapy within 3 days after HA-BSI occurrence or requiring prolonged therapy (due to infection source, microorganism, or clinical deterioration) were excluded. Treatment failure, defined as death, persistent infection, or subsequent infectious complications by Day 28, was assessed using an inverse-probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) logistic regression.

Results

Among 2600 patients, 550 were eligible for shortened treatment, 213 received short, and 337 received long treatment. The most common infection source was respiratory (33%), most common microorganisms were Enterobacterales (39%). Patients with long treatment were more frequently infected with Staphylococcus aureus (11% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.025) or difficult-to-treat microorganisms (23% vs. 7%, p < 0.001), and received more commonly combination therapy (46% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). Short treatment was associated with reduced 28-day treatment failure (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.93, p = 0.019), mainly due to reduction in subsequent infectious complications (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37–0.91, p = 0.018). Mortality (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.59, 1.43], p = 0.7) and persistent infection rates (OR 0.47 [95% CI 0.17, 1.14], p = 0.12) were similar.

Conclusions

In selected ICU patients with HA-BSI, shortened antibiotic treatment might be considered. Eurobact2 was a prospective international cohort study, registered in ClinicalTrials.org (NCT03937245).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the OUTCOMEREA organization on reasonable request.

Change history

References

  1. Timsit JF, Ruppé E, Barbier F, Tabah A, Bassetti M (2020) Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement. Intensive Care Med févr 46(2):266–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goto M, Al-Hasan MN (2013) Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect juin 19(6):501–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabah A, Buetti N, Staiquly Q, Ruckly S, Akova M, Aslan AT et al (2023) Epidemiology and outcomes of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients: the EUROBACT-2 international cohort study. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06944-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Adrie C, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Essaied WI, Schwebel C, Darmon M, Mourvillier B et al (2017) Attributable mortality of ICU-acquired bloodstream infections: impact of the source, causative micro-organism, resistance profile and antimicrobial therapy. J Infect 74(2):131–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Loiodice A, Bailly PharmD S, Ruckly S, Buetti N, Barbier F, Staiquly Q et al (2024) Effect of adequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy for hospital-acquired bloodstream infections on ICU patient prognosis: a causal inference approach using data from the Eurobact2 study. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis S1198–743X(24)00443–9

  6. Curran J, Lo J, Leung V, Brown K, Schwartz KL, Daneman N et al (2022) Estimating daily antibiotic harms: an umbrella review with individual study meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 28(4):479–490

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cižman M, Plankar Srovin T (2018) Antibiotic consumption and resistance of gram-negative pathogens (collateral damage). GMS Infect Dis 6:Doc05

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Alwan M, Davis JS, Daneman N, Fowler R, Shehabi Y, Rogers B (2019) Duration of therapy recommended for bacteraemic illness varies widely amongst clinicians. Int J Antimicrob Agents août 54(2):184–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yahav D, Franceschini E, Koppel F, Turjeman A, Babich T, Bitterman R et al (2019) Seven versus 14 days of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 69(7):1091–1098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chotiprasitsakul D, Han JH, Cosgrove SE, Harris AD, Lautenbach E, Conley AT et al (2018) Comparing the outcomes of adults with enterobacteriaceae bacteremia receiving short-course versus prolonged-course antibiotic therapy in a multicenter, propensity score-matched cohort. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 66(2):172–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tansarli GS, Andreatos N, Pliakos EE, Mylonakis E (2019) A systematic review and meta-analysis of antibiotic treatment duration for bacteremia due to enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother mai 63(5):e02495-e2518

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Turjeman A, von Dach E, Molina J, Franceschini E, Koppel F, Yelin D et al (2023) Duration of antibiotic treatment for Gram-negative bacteremia—systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 55:101750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbas M, Rossel A, de Kraker MEA, von Dach E, Marti C, Emonet S et al (2020) Association between treatment duration and mortality or relapse in adult patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 26(5):626–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Daneman N, Rishu AH, Xiong W, Bagshaw SM, Dodek P, Hall R et al (2016) Duration of antimicrobial treatment for bacteremia in canadian critically ill patients*. Crit Care Med 44(2):256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. BALANCE Investigators, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada Clinical Research Network, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, and the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Network, Daneman N, Rishu A, Pinto R, Rogers BA, Shehabi Y et al (2024) Antibiotic treatment for 7 versus 14 days in patients with bloodstream infections. N Engl J Med

  16. Delgado V, Ajmone Marsan N, de Waha S, Bonaros N, Brida M, Burri H et al (2023) 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of endocarditis. Eur Heart J 44(39):3948–4042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodilsen J, D’Alessandris QG, Humphreys H, Iro MA, Klein M, Last K et al (2024) European society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of brain abscess in children and adults. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30(1):66–89

    Google Scholar 

  18. Couderc M, Bart G, Coiffier G, Godot S, Seror R, Ziza JM et al (2020) 2020 French recommendations on the management of septic arthritis in an adult native joint. Joint Bone Spine 87(6):538–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lacasse M, Derolez S, Bonnet E, Amelot A, Bouyer B, Carlier R et al (2023) 2022 SPILF—Clinical Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of disco-vertebral infection in adults. Infect Dis Now 53(3):104647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cuenca-Estrella M, Verweij PE, Arendrup MC, Arikan-Akdagli S, Bille J, Donnelly JP et al (2012) ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: diagnostic procedures. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:9–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L et al (2016) Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 62(4):e1–e50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Timsit JF, Fosse JP, Troché G, De Lassence A, Alberti C, Garrouste-Orgeas M et al (2002) Calibration and discrimination by daily Logistic Organ Dysfunction scoring comparatively with daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med sept 30(9):2003–2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Soto CL, Hsu AJ, Lee JH, Dzintars K, Choudhury R, Jenkins TC et al (2024) Identifying effective durations of antibiotic therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales bloodstream infections: a multicenter observational study. Clin Infect Dis 78(1):27–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kadri SS, Adjemian J, Lai YL, Spaulding AB, Ricotta E, Prevots DR et al (2018) Difficult-to-treat resistance in gram-negative bacteremia at 173 US hospitals: retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and outcome of resistance to all first-line agents. Clin Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy378/5057528

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Echols RM, Tillotson GS (2019) Difficult to treat: Do we need a new definition? Clin Infect Dis 69(9):1641–1642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cevallos M, Egger M (2014) STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology). In: Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Simera I, Wager E (eds) Guidelines for reporting health research: a user’s manual, 1st edn. Wiley, pp 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118715598.ch17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Bai AD, Lo CKL, Komorowski AS, Suresh M, Guo K, Garg A et al (2022) How generalizable are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia? A description of the mortality gap between RCTs and observational studies. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 75(8):1449–1452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050 - The Lancet. Available at: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01867-1/fulltext

  29. Zhou C, Jin L, Wang Q, Wang X, Chen F, Gao Y et al (2021) Bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales: risk factors for mortality, antimicrobial therapy and treatment outcomes from a prospective multicenter study. Infect Drug Resist 14:731–742

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ (2022) Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 75(2):187–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Eichenberger EM, Fowler VG, Holland TL (2020) Duration of antibiotic therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: the long and the short of it. Clin Microbiol Infect 26(5):536–538

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chong YP, Moon SM, Bang KM, Park HJ, Park SY, Kim MN et al (2013) Treatment duration for uncomplicated staphylococcus aureus bacteremia to prevent relapse: analysis of a prospective observational cohort study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother mars 57(3):1150–1156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zanichelli V, Olearo F, Aiken AM (2024) Impact of shorter (<14 days) antibiotic treatment duration in adults with uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Pract 21:100346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schnizer M, Schellong P, Rose N, Fleischmann-Struzek C, Hagel S, Abbas M et al (2024) Long versus short course anti-microbial therapy of uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect Off Publ Eur Soc Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30(10):1254–1260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thorlacius-Ussing L, Sandholdt H, Nissen J, Rasmussen J, Skov R, Frimodt-Møller N et al (2021) Comparable outcomes of short-course and prolonged-course therapy in selected cases of methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a pooled cohort study. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am 73(5):866–872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou Z, Rahme E, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L (2005) Survival bias associated with time-to-treatment initiation in drug effectiveness evaluation: a comparison of methods. Am J Epidemiol 162(10):1016–1023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The EUROBACT-2 study was endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the infection section of the ESCIM and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) study Group for Infections in Critically Ill Patients (ESGCIP), with scientific input of the OUTCOMEREA network. The Eurobact 2 study group is listed in the electronic supplementary material 2.

Funding

Eurobact2 original study was funded by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) study Group for Infections in Critically Ill Patients (ESGCIP), the Norva Dahlia foundation and the Redcliffe Hospital Private Practice Trust Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

LG, NB, SR and JFT designed and conducted the study. LG and SR performed the statistical analyses. LG wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors performed critical review of the manuscript. NB and JFT supervised the writing process.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-François Timsit.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

LG has nothing to disclose, NB has nothing to disclose, AT has nothing to disclose, SR has nothing to disclose, MA has nothing to disclose, FS has nothing to disclose, KA has nothing to disclose JJW has nothing to disclose, HB has nothing to disclose, FB reported consulting fees from Shionogi, lecture fees from MSD and Advanz Pharma, conference invitations from Pfizer, and research grants from MSD, JFT reported advisory boards participation for Merck, Gilead, Beckton-Dickinson, Pfizer, Menarini, Advanz, Paratek, research grants from Merck and Pfizer.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Initial ethical approval as a low-risk research project with waiver of individual consent was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Queensland, Australia (LNR/2019/ QRBW/48376). Each study site then obtained ethical and governance approvals according to national and/or local regulations.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of the Eurobact2 study group are listed in electronic supplementary material 2.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13244 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 46 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gajdos, L., Buetti, N., Tabah, A. et al. Shortening antibiotic therapy duration for hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: a causal inference model from the international EUROBACT-2 database. Intensive Care Med 51, 518–528 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07857-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07857-6

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Lena Gajdos
  2. Jean-François Timsit