Surprising Geometric Constructions: Ancient Tools and Modern Technology

1. George E Martin, Geometric Constructions, Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.

   Google Scholar 

2. D J P Marshall, Origins of an obsession, Nexus Network Journal, pp.53–64, 2006.

3. A S Smogorzhevskii, The Ruler in Geometric Constructions (Trans.), Blaisdell Publishing Company (original work published 1957), 1961.

   Google Scholar 

4. H David, The PISA results in mathematics and science: A comparison between Israel and Turkey, Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness, Vol.3, No.1, pp.22–28, 2015.

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. H David, Teaching mathematically gifted students in Israel: The state of the art, Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, Vol.7, No.1, pp.57–69, 2019.

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Y Feniger, Evidence-based decision making or a tunnel vision effect? TIMSS, problem definition and policy change in Israeli mathematics education, Critical Studies in Education, Vol.61, No.3, pp.363–379., 2020.

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. OECD, Building a high-quality teaching profession: Lessons from around the world, Background Report for the International Summit on the Teaching Profession, http://asiasociety.org/files/lwtw-teachersummit.pdf

8. OECD, Education 2030 Position Paper: The Future of Education and Skills, https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

9. OECD, Future of Education and Skills 2030, OECD Learning Compass 2030: A Series of Concept Notes, 2019, https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf

   Google Scholar 

10. D L Ball, M H Thames and G Phelps, Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it so special? Journal of Teacher Education, Vol.59, pp.389–407, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. P Mishra and M J Koehler, Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge, Teachers College Record, Vol.108, No.6, pp.1017–1054, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. M Koehler and P Mishra, What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)?, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, Vol.9, No.1, pp.60–70, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

13. N Arbain and N A Shukor, The effects of GeoGebra on students achievement, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, pp.208–214, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.356.

    Google Scholar 

14. R Segal, M Stupel, A Sigler, J Jahangiril, The effectiveness of the ‘what if not’ strategy coupled with dynamic geometry software in an inquiry-based geometry classroom, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, Vol.4, No.7, pp.1099–1109, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2018.1452302

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. R Segal, V Oxman and M Stupel, Using dynamic geometry software to enhance specialized content knowledge: Pre-service mathematics teachers’ perceptions, International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, Vol.16, No.3, p.em0647, 2021. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11065

    Google Scholar 

16. N Budinski, Z Lavicza and K Fenyvesi, Ideas for using GeoGebra and origami in teaching regular polyhedrons lessons, K-12 STEM Education, 4(1), pp.297–303, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

17. A Özerem, Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh-grade students, Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol.55, pp.720–729, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. D A Schmidt, E Baran, A D Thompson, P Mishra, M J Koehler and T S Shin, Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol.42, No.2, pp.123–149., 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references