Each manuscript undergoes single anonymous peer review after being assessed for suitability for the journal by a subgroup of Editorial Board Members. If the manuscript is deemed suitable the handling Editor will send it to at least 2 (and usually not more than 4) reviewers. Reviewers are active researchers in the field of mathematics education, usually at different stages of their careers, and at least one of them is an Editorial Board Member. The reviews are used by the handling Editor to make a decision on the manuscript (reject, accept the manuscript or ask for a revision, specifying whether major or minor and describing the changes that need to be made in order for the manuscript to be reconsidered for publication). The review process is usually repeated for more than once cycle.
Listen to Nathalie Sinclair discussing her article "Knowing as remembering: Methodological experiments in embodied experiences of number" published in Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education.
Click HERE for the podcast.
In this video Anna Baccaglini-Frank (Editor-in-Chief) introduces Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education (DEME), a Springer journal focusing on research in Mathematics Education with digital technology is at the forefront. The video presents the main types of papers that DEME publishes, that include more traditional formats, like Research Reports, as well as inspiring shorter formats, like Snapshots and Technology Reviews.
Watch the video HERE.
