Timeline for A curious case of $1729$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2018 at 7:30 | vote | accept | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | ||
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:33 | comment | added | MJD | Lawyers think they are the champion pettifoggers, but mathematicians are the true masters. | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:31 | history | edited | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:30 | comment | added | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | @MJD You will make good lawyer like Fermat. You caught me with the word 'positive' :P | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:29 | comment | added | Brian Tung | @MJD: Positive cubes, then. :-P | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:28 | history | edited | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:27 | comment | added | MJD | 1729 is not actually the smallest positive integer which can be written as the sum of two cubes in two different ways; 91 is. | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:25 | history | edited | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:20 | comment | added | Peter | @DanielFischer OK, I didn' know this. I am sorry. But maybe this question changes the trend and more puzzles are posted here. | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:18 | history | edited | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 189 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:14 | comment | added | Daniel Fischer | And I applaud you for clarifying the question in a timely fashion. | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:13 | comment | added | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | @DanielFischer - Fair enough. I agree with your point. | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:11 | comment | added | Daniel Fischer | @Peter The close vote was cast before the edit specifying the property. The question was unclear then. I had commented and asked the OP to make the desired property clear. If the close voter didn't want to watch the question to see whether it would be clarified, the close vote was perfectly reasonable then. Now that the question is clear, further close votes wouldn't be appropriate. (Whether the close voter comes back and retracts the close vote, or the close vote is left to age away is unimportant.) | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:09 | history | edited | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:00 | answer | added | user133281 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:00 | answer | added | Peter | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:00 | answer | added | PRT | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 19:56 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 20, 2016 at 20:13 | |||||
| Oct 20, 2016 at 19:56 | comment | added | Peter | The close-voter should , instead of voting for close, be glad that someone has the courage to post a puzzle here. I will never understand why such puzzles are not welcome here. (This question is an exception, $7$ upvotes are unusual). What I understand, that the forum is not a make-other-homeworks-forum, but what is bad about puzzles, I cannot imagine. | |
| Oct 20, 2016 at 19:42 | history | edited | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 124 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2016 at 19:37 | history | edited | ajotatxe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2016 at 19:32 | history | asked | Nilotpal Kanti Sinha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |