Timeline for Thinking of $\int f(x) g(nx) dx$ as an integral with respect to the measure $g(nx)dx$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Aug 11, 2019 at 2:02 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed limit format a little
|
| Aug 11, 2019 at 1:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 11, 2019 at 2:02 | |||||
| Aug 10, 2019 at 23:35 | answer | added | Feng | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 10, 2019 at 20:22 | comment | added | user9781778 | The limits are all taken over $n$. I was also told it would be good to think about this problem if you take $g$ to be something like $sin(n\pi x)$ to get some intuition. | |
| Aug 10, 2019 at 20:10 | comment | added | herb steinberg | What is the role of $n$ in $g(nx)$? | |
| Aug 10, 2019 at 19:42 | history | edited | user9781778 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Aug 10, 2019 at 19:42 | comment | added | user9781778 | @BrianMoehring Yes, my bad. The problem says exactly that. I will edit the question. | |
| Aug 10, 2019 at 19:40 | comment | added | Brian Moehring | Presumably we have a restriction on $f$? Possibly $f \in L^1[0,1]$? | |
| Aug 10, 2019 at 19:30 | history | asked | user9781778 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |