Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
BCLC
  • 14.4k
  • 13
  • 76
  • 179
added 36 characters in body
Source Link
Michael Albanese
  • 105.3k
  • 23
  • 228
  • 496

The Radon–Nikodym theorem states that,

given a measurable space (X,Σ)$(X,\Sigma)$, if a σ $\sigma$-finite measure ν$\nu$ on (X,Σ)$(X,\Sigma)$ is absolutely absolutely continuous with respect to a σ a $\sigma$-finite measure μ$\mu$ on (X,Σ)$(X,\Sigma)$, then there there is a measurable function $f$ on X $X$ and taking values in [0,∞)$[0,\infty)$, such that that

$$\nu(A) = \int_A f \, d\mu$$

for any measurable set $A$.

$f$ is called the Radon–Nikodym derivative of $\nu$ wrt $\mu$.

I was wondering in what cases the concept of Radon–Nikodym derivative and the concept of derivative in real analysis can coincide and how?

Thanks and regards!

The Radon–Nikodym theorem states that,

given a measurable space (X,Σ), if a σ-finite measure ν on (X,Σ) is absolutely continuous with respect to a σ-finite measure μ on (X,Σ), then there is a measurable function $f$ on X and taking values in [0,∞), such that

$$\nu(A) = \int_A f \, d\mu$$

for any measurable set $A$.

$f$ is called the Radon–Nikodym derivative of $\nu$ wrt $\mu$.

I was wondering in what cases the concept of Radon–Nikodym derivative and the concept of derivative in real analysis can coincide and how?

Thanks and regards!

The Radon–Nikodym theorem states that,

given a measurable space $(X,\Sigma)$, if a $\sigma$-finite measure $\nu$ on $(X,\Sigma)$ is absolutely continuous with respect to a $\sigma$-finite measure $\mu$ on $(X,\Sigma)$, then there is a measurable function $f$ on $X$ and taking values in $[0,\infty)$, such that

$$\nu(A) = \int_A f \, d\mu$$

for any measurable set $A$.

$f$ is called the Radon–Nikodym derivative of $\nu$ wrt $\mu$.

I was wondering in what cases the concept of Radon–Nikodym derivative and the concept of derivative in real analysis can coincide and how?

Thanks and regards!

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackMath/status/68105975621627904
added 1 characters in body
Source Link
t.b.
  • 81.8k
  • 14
  • 294
  • 350

The Radon–Nikodym theorem states that,

given a measurable space (X,Σ), if a σ-finite measure ν on (X,Σ) is absolutely continuous with respect to a σ-finite measure μ on (X,Σ), then there is a measurable function $f$ on X and taking values in [0,∞), such that

$$\nu(A) = \int_A f \, d\mu$$

for any measurable set $A$.

$f$ is called the Radon–Nikodym derivative of $\nu$ wrt $\mu$.

I was wondering in what cases the concept of Radon–Nikodym derivative and the concept of derivative in real analysis can coincide and how?

Thanks and regards!

The Radon–Nikodym theorem states that,

given a measurable space (X,Σ), if a σ-finite measure ν on (X,Σ) is absolutely continuous with respect to a σ-finite measure μ on (X,Σ), then there is a measurable function $f$ on X and taking values in [0,∞), such that

$$\nu(A) = \int_A f \, d\mu$$

for any measurable set $A$.

$f$ is called the Radon–Nikodym derivative of $\nu$ wrt $\mu$.

I was wondering in what cases the concept of Radon–Nikodym derivative and the concept of derivative in real analysis can coincide and how?

Thanks and regards!

The Radon–Nikodym theorem states that,

given a measurable space (X,Σ), if a σ-finite measure ν on (X,Σ) is absolutely continuous with respect to a σ-finite measure μ on (X,Σ), then there is a measurable function $f$ on X and taking values in [0,∞), such that

$$\nu(A) = \int_A f \, d\mu$$

for any measurable set $A$.

$f$ is called the Radon–Nikodym derivative of $\nu$ wrt $\mu$.

I was wondering in what cases the concept of Radon–Nikodym derivative and the concept of derivative in real analysis can coincide and how?

Thanks and regards!

Source Link
Tim
  • 49.6k
  • 60
  • 266
  • 562
Loading