Timeline for Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and the isomorphism theorem
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2011 at 13:19 | vote | accept | Simon | ||
| May 22, 2011 at 9:47 | history | edited | t.b. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 22, 2011 at 8:01 | answer | added | Tim van Beek | timeline score: 14 | |
| May 22, 2011 at 6:42 | history | edited | Phira | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 22, 2011 at 1:33 | comment | added | Jonas Meyer | To make part of Theo's first comment more explicit: Elements of $L^2[0,1]$ are not functions. The problem isn't that evaluation at $x\in[0,1]$ isn't continuous, but that the evaluation doesn't exist. Also, a minor nitpick: 2 Hilbert spaces are isomorphic if they have orthonormal bases with the same cardinality (as is the case for $\ell_2$ and $L^2[0,1]$), not if the spaces themselves have the same cardinality. | |
| May 21, 2011 at 23:27 | comment | added | t.b. | More to the point, of course the functions can be interpreted on the respective sets, but the evaluation functionals won't necessarily be continuous anymore. | |
| May 21, 2011 at 23:12 | comment | added | Simon | Beautiful, thank you. | |
| May 21, 2011 at 23:11 | comment | added | t.b. | It is of fundamental importance that the elements of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space are functions on a set $X$. The reproducing kernel itself is a function on $X \times X$. The isomorphism between $\ell^2$ and $L^2[0,1]$ won't respect this interpretation of an element as a function on $\mathbb{N}$ or $[0,1]$. Jonas Meyer's answer to this question might clarify things a little. | |
| May 21, 2011 at 23:03 | history | asked | Simon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |