Timeline for A Theorem of Mihklin-Hörmander for $n=1$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2 at 10:26 | history | edited | Kadmos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Jan 20 at 11:16 | vote | accept | Kadmos | ||
| Jan 20 at 11:16 | answer | added | Kadmos | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 17 at 18:17 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 19 at 2:58 | |||||
| Jan 15 at 10:14 | history | edited | Kadmos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
never ending typos
|
| Jan 15 at 8:43 | history | edited | Kadmos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| S Jan 15 at 6:41 | history | suggested | Indecisive | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed grammar, spelling, parentheses
|
| Jan 15 at 5:18 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 15 at 6:41 | |||||
| Jan 14 at 19:50 | comment | added | user408858 | Appreciate the effort, but the post seems a bit long | |
| Jan 14 at 19:44 | history | edited | Kadmos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 120 characters in body
|
| Jan 14 at 19:42 | comment | added | Kadmos | @Aruralreader, thank you. I have edited the title. the proof is mostly irrelevant for what I am asking, it is just that I claimed that I solved it for $n\geq 2$, so I added the proof... My trouble is for $n=1$ and for that one doesn't need to read what I have done: my argument does not generalize nicely. | |
| Jan 14 at 18:42 | history | edited | Kadmos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Jan 14 at 18:14 | history | asked | Kadmos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |