Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
yesterday audit Reopen votes
20 hours ago
Apr 22 at 17:40 history edited Alma Arjuna CC BY-SA 4.0
added 542 characters in body
Apr 22 at 11:11 history edited Alma Arjuna CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 151 characters in body
Apr 22 at 3:13 history edited Alma Arjuna CC BY-SA 4.0
added 448 characters in body
Apr 22 at 0:16 history edited Alma Arjuna CC BY-SA 4.0
Improved Image
Apr 21 at 20:19 comment added Ethan Bolker The more general problem is to think about the shape of the four dimensional set of configurations of this linkage. There will be an open set on which the OP's four angles are local coordinates. What is the singular locus? The boundary?
Apr 21 at 17:41 answer added timon92 timeline score: 4
Apr 21 at 4:18 history became hot network question
Apr 20 at 22:01 comment added Alma Arjuna @DanUznanski yes, I see that! But the reason I found quadrilaterals to be interesting was exactly because, since we have four sides, there could be some symmetrical disposition for the angles defining it, something not possible for general polygons
Apr 20 at 21:48 answer added Intelligenti pauca timeline score: 11
Apr 20 at 21:30 comment added Dan Uznanski If you want easier, just take the two angles between diagonal and side at opposite corners. then it's just a pair of triangles again...
Apr 20 at 21:14 answer added Ethan Bolker timeline score: 3
Apr 20 at 20:40 history edited Alma Arjuna CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 9 characters in body
Apr 20 at 20:18 history asked Alma Arjuna CC BY-SA 4.0