9
$\begingroup$

I have a feeling the Disintegration Theorem and the Co-Area formula for Lipschitz functions are actually very much related but I cannot seem to formalize it.

DISINTEGRATION THEOREM: Let $(\mathsf{X}, \mathcal{X}, \mu)$ be a probability space and $(\mathsf{Y}, \mathcal{Y})$ be a measurable space. Let $\xi:\mathsf{X}\to\mathsf{Y}$ be a random variable with distribution $\nu = \mu \circ \xi^{-1}$. Then $\nu$-almost everywhere there exists a uniquely determined family of probability measures $\{\mu_y\}_{y\in\mathsf{Y}}$ on $(\mathsf{X}, \mathcal{X})$ such that (...skipping some results...) for any Borel measurable function $f:\mathsf{X}\to[0, \infty]$ the following is satisfied: $$ \int_{\mathsf{X}} f(x) d\mu(x) = \int_{\mathsf{Y}}\int_{\xi^{-1}(y)} f(x) d\mu_y(x) d\nu(y) $$

CO-AREA FORMULA: Let $\xi:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^n$ be Lipschitz with $m > n$ and $f:\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}$ be Lebesgue measurable with generalized Jacobian $J_n\xi(x) = \left|D\xi(x) D\xi(x)^\top\right|^{1/2}$. Then $$ \int_{\mathbb{R}^m} f(x) \lambda^m(dx) = \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}\int_{\xi^{-1}(y)} f(x) J_n\xi(x)^{-1}\mathcal{H}^{m-n}(dx) \lambda^n(dy) $$ where $\lambda^n$ is the $n$-dimensional Lebesgue measure and $\mathcal{H}^{n-m}$ is the $(n-m)$-dimensional Hausdorff measure on $\xi^{-1}(y)$.

Attempted Solution

The disintegration theorem seems to provide sufficiency conditions for this type of decomposition to happen, whereas the Co-Area formula gives an expression for the measures $\mu_y$ in a specific case. My guess is that one should take:

  • $(\mathsf{X}, \mathcal{X}) = (\mathbb{R}^m, \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^m))$
  • $(\mathsf{Y}, \mathcal{Y}) = (\mathbb{R}^n, \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^n))$
  • $\mu = \lambda^m$
  • $\nu = \xi_*\lambda^m$

The only way in which I can conciliate the two formulas is if the following is somehow true $$ d\mu_y(x)d\nu(y) = J_n\xi(x)^{-1}d\mathcal{H}^{m-n}(dx)\lambda^n(dy). $$ Not sure how to show it. Somehow I have a feeling that the Radon-Nikodym derivative of the pushed-forward Lebesgue measure and the Lebesgue measure gives a Jacobian $$ \frac{d \xi_*\lambda^m}{d\lambda_m} = J_n \xi(x). $$ When $\xi$ is a diffeomorphism this would be coherent with the change of variables formula found in multivariable calculus where $$ \frac{d \xi_*\lambda^m}{d\lambda_m} = |D\xi(x)| $$

$\endgroup$

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.