Timeline for answer to What's a replacement for "married couples" in combinatorics problems? by Pharap
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2018 at 14:06 | comment | added | Feathercrown | @Pharap It's not laughter it's the jokes they'd be distracted by | |
| Mar 8, 2018 at 19:52 | comment | added | Pharap | @Feathercrown In that case I don't think it would be particularly distracting, I think most 17 year olds where I'm from (Britain) would be mature enough to talk gametes and zygotes without bursting into laughter. Maybe other cultures are less mature at 17? If anything I would have thought it would make maths more interesting. | |
| Mar 8, 2018 at 5:44 | comment | added | Feathercrown | @Pharap I was assuming early college, so 17, but I don't think they specified.... :/ | |
| Mar 7, 2018 at 1:15 | comment | added | Pharap | @Feathercrown What age are we talking? Where I'm from we weren't taught combinatorics even at age 16. | |
| Mar 6, 2018 at 17:35 | comment | added | Feathercrown | Teenagers+Sexual topics = jokes and stuff tho = inattentiveness | |
| Mar 5, 2018 at 23:45 | comment | added | Pharap | @CarlWitthoft Would the students know or care though? | |
| Mar 5, 2018 at 20:51 | comment | added | Carl Witthoft | Except that is incorrect. first of all, rare cases of viable embryos with two sperms entering the egg happen. Second, a single sperm cannot achieve penetration without the help of a lot of pals banging (sorry) away at the egg's surface. | |
| Mar 5, 2018 at 13:28 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Mar 5, 2018 at 15:46 | |||||
| Mar 5, 2018 at 10:25 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 5, 2018 at 18:15 | |||||
| Mar 5, 2018 at 10:23 | history | answered | Pharap | CC BY-SA 3.0 |