Timeline for answer to Real-world examples of more "obscure" geometric figures by OldCurmudgeon
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2015 at 13:42 | comment | added | Christopher King | @JessicaB When I draw a "cube", I'm only drawing a representation, not an actual cube. Likewise, they didn't build an actual hypercube, just a representation. Its even still a representation in real life, not just the photo. Saying this is a actually hypercube would be like saying dodecahedron in a movie are actual dodecahedron. | |
| Aug 24, 2015 at 12:50 | comment | added | Jessica B | @PyRulez Do you think you can draw a cube on a piece of paper? Presumably you do, since you seem happy that the outer structure in this photo is a cube. If that's ok, why do you object to projecting the fourth dimension into three? | |
| Apr 12, 2015 at 1:15 | comment | added | Christopher King | I don't think "in/out" counts as another dimensions though. | |
| Mar 6, 2015 at 15:38 | history | answered | OldCurmudgeon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |