Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! It seems that the same should hold for smooth isotrivial families of varieties of non-negative Kodaira dimension? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 24, 2014 at 20:53
  • $\begingroup$ It seems likely, but I am not completely sure: you might get into trouble with automorphisms acting trivially in cohomology, for instance. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 25, 2014 at 6:54
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ At least in characteristic 0, I think it should be fine for all non-uniruled varieties. Of course everything is fine when the automorphism group is finite (or can be "naturally" reduced to a finite group). That leaves varieties whose automorphism group contains a positive-dimensional (connected) linear group. But all such groups are (geometrically) rational. Thus the orbits are unirational. So the variety is uniruled. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 25, 2014 at 12:44