Timeline for answer to Creating high quality figures of surfaces by jeremy
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2023 at 14:47 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| May 25, 2010 at 21:37 | comment | added | jeremy | Really? I thought some of them looked quite nice. At least, when you look at the large versions of the images (aside from the compression artifacting visible on some of them), the small versions can look kind of funny. Although now that I look at those pages, I see those were made with 1 or 2 iterations old Mathematica (5 or 6) while the 7 ones can look nicer. How about something like this that took me like 5 minutes to make in Mathematica 7: img44.imageshack.us/img44/297/shapey.png? You can make things nicer if you play around with the lighting, specularity, etc. | |
| May 25, 2010 at 18:03 | comment | added | Philipp | thanks for the suggestion. To be honest, I do not find these figures to be of very high quality. | |
| May 25, 2010 at 17:33 | history | answered | jeremy | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
