Timeline for answer to Properties of a "research announcement" by Alexandre Eremenko
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2020 at 20:21 | vote | accept | Jamie Vicary | ||
| Aug 8, 2018 at 22:16 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Aug 8, 2018 at 15:03 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | @Deane Yang: I agree, and there is also another reason for this. See the "EDIT" in the end of my answer. I just counted: Until 1999 I published 17 research announcements, and after 1999 only two. Though my general publication rate was constant. | |
| Aug 8, 2018 at 14:47 | comment | added | Deane Yang | @AlexandreEremenko, it does appear to me that nowadays there are fewer math papers published in the PNAS than in the past. Maybe others feel the same way as you do. | |
| Aug 8, 2018 at 14:34 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | @Deane Yang: Finally I convinced them to publish the short note, but I do not send my papers to this journal anymore. | |
| Aug 8, 2018 at 14:28 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | @Deane Yang: This is correct, in principle. The problem is that this is not a mathematical journal. Personally, I have a bad experience with it (and some my friends too). After obtaining an endorsement of an Academy member, they required that "a complete version of the paper be accepted in another journal" (see the answer of Carlo Beenakker). On my opinion, this requirement is absurd. My long and complete paper happened to be accepted. When I informed the editor about this, he replied: "But then there is no reason to publish a short announcement!" | |
| Aug 8, 2018 at 14:24 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 134 characters in body
|
| Aug 8, 2018 at 14:22 | comment | added | Deane Yang | What about papers in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (in the US)? My impression is that they are also unrefereeed announcements. They just have to be endorsed by a member of the NAS. | |
| Aug 8, 2018 at 14:19 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 134 characters in body
|
| Aug 8, 2018 at 14:12 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 383 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2018 at 12:48 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 250 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2018 at 12:40 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 250 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2018 at 12:32 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 250 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2018 at 12:22 | history | edited | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 250 characters in body
|
| Aug 7, 2018 at 12:14 | comment | added | Alexandre Eremenko | @Yemon Choi: Yes, FA&A had two parts: for long articles and short "notes". Also "Uspekhi Mat Nauk" (Russian Math Surveys) published short announcements; they were not translated in the English version. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 13:23 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Would you say that Functional Analysis and Applications also had similar aims, at least originally? | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 12:52 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | The AMS Notices also had abstracts "presented by title". These were similar to the abstracts of talks at AMS meetings, but there was no actual talk associated to the abstract. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 12:43 | history | answered | Alexandre Eremenko | CC BY-SA 4.0 |