Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 27, 2019 at 19:15 answer added Deane Yang timeline score: 2
Jan 27, 2019 at 1:19 comment added Deane Yang This by the way is the Gauss equation that gives the Riemann curvature in terms of the second fundamental form of a hypersurface. Indeed, when the dimension is 2, the result is the determinant of the second fundamental form.
Jan 26, 2019 at 18:54 comment added Deane Yang First, use the fact that $E\otimes E = \mathrm{Hom}(E^*, E)$. A map $h: E^* \rightarrow E$ induces a map $H: \bigwedge^2E^* \rightarrow \bigwedge^2E$, i.e., $H\in \bigwedge^2E\otimes \bigwedge^2E$.
Jan 26, 2019 at 18:24 comment added Sasha The determinant of a matrix with a fixed frame depends skew-symmetrically (not symmetrically) on the frame, so the source of your map should be $\wedge^2E$. Also, as @JasonStarr explained, the target is $\wedge^2E$. So, in the end, I think you are asking about a natural map $\wedge^2E \to \wedge^2E$. And the answer to this question is, of course, the identity.
Jan 26, 2019 at 16:41 comment added Jason Starr Why is there the tensor exponent "$\otimes 2$"? The usual determinant has target $\bigwedge^2 E$, not $(\bigwedge^2 E)^{\otimes 2}$. Are you asking about the square of the determinant?
Jan 26, 2019 at 15:28 comment added user61586 No, I am in characteristic zero. I am thinking of a quadratic map $Sym^2(E)\rightarrow (\bigwedge^2 E)^{\otimes 2}$. But yes, frankly I am not even sure something like this exists. For instance, I tried starting with the map $E^{\otimes 4}\rightarrow (\bigwedge^2 E)^{\otimes 2}$ mapping $v_1\otimes v_2\otimes v_3\otimes v_4\mapsto (v_1\wedge v_3)\otimes (v_2\wedge v_4)+(v_2\wedge v_3)\otimes (v_1\wedge v_4)$ but it does not seem to induce a map $Sym^2(E)\rightarrow (\bigwedge^2 E)^{\otimes 2}$ with the property I want.
Jan 26, 2019 at 15:22 comment added Donu Arapura I don't even think that there is a natural map unless you're in characteristic $2$. Otherwise, these correspond to distinct irreducible representations of $GL_2$.
Jan 26, 2019 at 15:20 review Close votes
Jan 28, 2019 at 9:38
Jan 26, 2019 at 15:17 comment added user61586 Thanks for the answer but not quite. In local coordinates write $u = ai+bj$ and $v = ci+dj$. Then $u\otimes v = ac (i\otimes i) + ad (i\otimes j) + bc (j\otimes i) + bd (j\otimes j)$, and the corresponding matrix would be $M = (m_{i,j})$ with $m_{1,1} = ac, m_{1,2} = ad, m_{2,1} = bc, m_{2,2} = bd$. Since the map I am looking for should give the determinant of the matrix it should be zero on tensors of type $u\otimes v$. Here i considered the non symmetric case but the same question make sense replacing $E\otimes E$ with $Sym^2(E)$.
Jan 26, 2019 at 14:48 comment added Ben McKay The vector bundle $\operatorname{Sym}^2E$ is spanned by local sections which are symmetric products $u \cdot v$. Map to $(u\wedge v)^{\otimes 2}$. Extend by linearity. Is that not the sort of answer you are looking for?
Jan 26, 2019 at 14:39 history asked user61586 CC BY-SA 4.0