Timeline for answer to Is a direct sum of flabby sheaves flabby? by Alexander Betts
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2020 at 7:55 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Dear@Andrea, this is wonderful news! When I wrote about my hope, I actually thought that its realization was not very probable: I'm happy you are showing me that I was unduly pessimistic! I am delighted that you are writing a follow-up to the book I downloaded a few months ago from the AMS site, and which I much appreciated. Thanks a lot for that great document and my best wishes for the future one. | |
| Jul 24, 2020 at 13:48 | comment | added | Andrea Ferretti | @GeorgesElencwajg It will. :-) I am writing a sequel to ams.org/open-math-notes/omn-view-listing?listingId=110823 that will be about homological methods in commutative algebra. The first half or so is about homological algebra per se, and there sheaves appear as a fundamental recurring example. I am putting Alexander's counterexample as a guided exercise. | |
| Jul 19, 2020 at 18:08 | vote | accept | Georges Elencwajg | ||
| Jul 19, 2020 at 18:08 | comment | added | Georges Elencwajg | Thank you, Alexander: this is a perfect counterexample. I hope it will find its place in some basic book using sheaves, or maybe become an item in the Stacks Project. | |
| Jul 19, 2020 at 14:24 | comment | added | Chris | @ChrisGerig Flabbyness is preserved for arbitrary direct products and a finite sum of abelian sheaves is the same as their finite product. | |
| Jul 19, 2020 at 14:05 | comment | added | Chris Gerig | What about finite direct sums? (Or is that a basic sheaf theory fact?) | |
| Jul 19, 2020 at 14:01 | history | answered | Alexander Betts | CC BY-SA 4.0 |