Timeline for answer to Conceptual reason why the sign of a permutation is well-defined? by Hecatonchires
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2023 at 10:55 | history | edited | Hecatonchires | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Apr 6, 2022 at 10:48 | history | edited | Hecatonchires | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I hope "alternation" is an acceptable noun, describing the property of an alternating map?
|
| Apr 5, 2022 at 13:40 | comment | added | LSpice | This is a great answer. (It's a bit confusing to use $\psi$ for an element of $V$ rather than of $V^*$ … but maybe that's just my taste in naming vectors.) What you propose as a sufficient condition for anti-symmetry is, I would argue, the right definition—usually called ‘alternating’—as the only one that carries over sensibly to characteristic $2$; but, of course, in characteristic $2$, one doesn't worry about defining the sign anyway. | |
| Apr 5, 2022 at 12:37 | history | edited | Hecatonchires | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 323 characters in body
|
| S Apr 2, 2022 at 10:46 | history | suggested | The Amplitwist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added link to cited comment
|
| Apr 2, 2022 at 6:55 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 2, 2022 at 10:46 | |||||
| Apr 1, 2022 at 13:52 | history | edited | Hecatonchires | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Apr 1, 2022 at 13:42 | history | answered | Hecatonchires | CC BY-SA 4.0 |