Timeline for answer to Special determinant formula by dharr
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2025 at 0:38 | history | edited | dharr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add minor clarification
|
| Dec 29, 2024 at 6:01 | history | edited | dharr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fix minor error
|
| Dec 29, 2024 at 2:17 | comment | added | dharr | For the inverse, it's not clear what form you want, which presumably depends on what you want to do with it.. Now that you have the determinant, the simplest is just the adjugate divided by the determinant. If you want a formula in terms of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues, $M(mk)^{-1}=U^{T} \Lambda ^{-1}U$ (different $U$ than in my answer), then finding the last eigenvectors is non-trivial and involves roots of a cubic. | |
| Dec 28, 2024 at 21:19 | history | edited | dharr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Dec 28, 2024 at 20:29 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor tidying, while this is on the front page
|
| Dec 28, 2024 at 19:58 | history | edited | dharr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
correct typo
|
| Dec 28, 2024 at 19:47 | history | edited | dharr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Replaced with complete proof
|
| Dec 25, 2024 at 14:01 | comment | added | Honza | Nice observation by @dharr. PS In addition to a determinant, I'll also need the inverse. | |
| Dec 24, 2024 at 16:52 | history | edited | dharr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Dec 24, 2024 at 6:52 | comment | added | dharr | I think I can prove this but will need to work with the eigenvectors, which will be fiddly, so may take a few days, | |
| Dec 24, 2024 at 6:46 | history | answered | dharr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |