Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What philosophical reasons? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 14, 2010 at 21:45
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ I would say the Erdős–Renyi/Rado graph en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rado_graph rather than this, if you're looking for something from graph theory. This occurs as the Fraïssé limit of the category of finite graphs and embeddings golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2009/11/fraisse_limits.html $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 14, 2010 at 23:57
  • $\begingroup$ David: isn't that graph also known as "the" random graph on a countably infinite vertex set? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 15, 2010 at 0:16
  • $\begingroup$ Gil: For the reason that it can easily demonstrate the existence of a graph with a beautiful and intricate structure without explicitly exhibiting it. Although you could argue that we may as well say that a coin flip is is an intricate and beautiful structure. Also, it should maybe be disqualified by your "single object" specification. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 15, 2010 at 3:27