Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A google search has a carbon footprint of about 0.2g of CO2. A chatgpt request about 4g. Better or worse depends on your criteria. $\endgroup$ Commented 9 hours ago
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If your numbers are right, it sounds like it is worse relative to both criteria, unless you want more pollution or you like ineffective search engines. $\endgroup$ Commented 7 hours ago
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ It may be worth pointing out (as this survey does) that the work of Faltings implied that the set of all exponents (not just prime exponents) for which FLT holds has density 1, and in particular is infinite. $\endgroup$ Commented 6 hours ago
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Is ChatGPT a fan of NCIS? $\endgroup$ Commented 6 hours ago
  • $\begingroup$ @Aurel Just to put this in perspective, burning a gallon of gasoline produces almost 9000g of CO2. So, driving a mile in a car that gets say 25 mpg produces 350g of CO2. $\endgroup$ Commented 27 mins ago